Multi-factor analysis on thermal comfort and energy saving potential for PCM-integrated buildings in summer

The multi-factor orthogonal simulation analysis was initiated to investigate the influence degree of four key parameters of PCM-integrated building envelopes on energy consumption and indoor thermal comfort under Chinese climate. The sensitivity and the interaction between four key parameters on ene...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy and buildings 2021-06, Vol.241, p.110966, Article 110966
Hauptverfasser: Qu, Y., Zhou, D., Xue, F., Cui, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The multi-factor orthogonal simulation analysis was initiated to investigate the influence degree of four key parameters of PCM-integrated building envelopes on energy consumption and indoor thermal comfort under Chinese climate. The sensitivity and the interaction between four key parameters on energy saving and indoor temperature were discussed. The results showed that: 1) According to the influence degree on energy consumption and indoor thermal comfort time, the four key parameters of PCM envelope can be ranked in descending order as follows: envelope type > PCM layer layout > PCM type > PCM layer thickness. 2) The optimal level of all the cases studied is using BioPCMTM23 (PCM2) with a thickness of 7 cm on the inner side of both wall and roof. 3) Integrating the PCM to the envelope can effectively reduce the indoor temperature fluctuation. Considerable energy saving effects (the energy saving rate is 4.8% – 34.8%) can be achieved by properly selecting the PCMs according to local climatic conditions. The PCMs with high latent heat should be selected and placed in an envelope structure that receives longtime solar radiation and has a large surface area, which can maximize the effect of energy saving and temperature control.
ISSN:0378-7788
1872-6178
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110966