Validity of endoscopic resection for clinically diagnosed T1a-MM/T1b-SM1 N0 M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Background Previous guidelines have not described clear recommendations for performing endoscopic resection (ER) of T1a-muscularis mucosa (MM)/T1b-submucosal (SM1) cancers that have invaded ≤ 200 μm because these are considered to have a non-negligible risk of metastasis based on previous analyses o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society 2021-07, Vol.18 (3), p.585-593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Previous guidelines have not described clear recommendations for performing endoscopic resection (ER) of T1a-muscularis mucosa (MM)/T1b-submucosal (SM1) cancers that have invaded ≤ 200 μm because these are considered to have a non-negligible risk of metastasis based on previous analyses of pathologically diagnosed (p)MM/SM1 cancers. Considering that the indication for ER is determined based on a clinical diagnosis, the applicability of ER should be investigated in clinical (c)MM/SM1 but not pMM/SM1 cancers. This study aimed to evaluate validity of ER for cMM/SM1 cancers.
Methods
In total, 175 cMM/SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases that were endoscopically or surgically resected between January 2008 and December 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. We histologically evaluated resected specimens and divided them into low- (
n
= 92) and high-risk (
n
= 83) cancers for metastasis.
Results
Univariate analysis showed that longer tumor length and larger circumferential extent were significantly correlated with high-risk cancer (
P
3/4 and |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1612-9059 1612-9067 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10388-021-00814-4 |