Optimal trough concentration of teicoplanin for the treatment of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

What is known and objective It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 μg/ml for difficult‐to‐treat complicated infections caused by methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 μg/ml i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 2021-06, Vol.46 (3), p.622-632
Hauptverfasser: Hanai, Yuki, Takahashi, Yoshiko, Niwa, Takashi, Mayumi, Toshihiko, Hamada, Yukihiro, Kimura, Toshimi, Matsumoto, Kazuaki, Fujii, Satoshi, Takesue, Yoshio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:What is known and objective It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 μg/ml for difficult‐to‐treat complicated infections caused by methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 μg/ml is required for non‐complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin. Methods We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi‐Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. Results and discussion Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin 
ISSN:0269-4727
1365-2710
DOI:10.1111/jcpt.13366