Rapakivi Granites of the Kodar Complex (Aldan Shield): Age, Sources, and Tectonic Setting

The paper reports geochemical, geochronological (ID–TIMS zircon U–Pb) and isotope–geochemical (Nd, Pb) study of granitoids of the Kodar complex developed in the western part of the Aldan shield. It has been established that these rocks can be classified as postcollisional A–type rapakivi granites, w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Petrology 2021-05, Vol.29 (3), p.277-299
Hauptverfasser: Larin, A. M., Kotov, A. B., Kovach, V. P., Sal’nikova, E. B., Gladkochub, D. P., Savatenkov, V. M., Velikoslavinskii, S. D., Skovitina, T. M., Rizvanova, N. G., Sergeeva, N. A., Vodovozov, V. Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper reports geochemical, geochronological (ID–TIMS zircon U–Pb) and isotope–geochemical (Nd, Pb) study of granitoids of the Kodar complex developed in the western part of the Aldan shield. It has been established that these rocks can be classified as postcollisional A–type rapakivi granites, which together with the mafic–ultramafic rocks of the Chinei complex compose a single magmatic association formed within 1876 ± 4–1859 ± 2 Ma. The massifs of this association are a part of the giant South Siberian magmatic belt over 2500 km in length, which was formed at the final stage (1.88–1.84 Ga) of evolution of the Paleoproterozoic orogen. Globally, this belt is the largest stitching suture, which marks the formation of the Siberian craton and its entrance into the Paleoproterozoic Nuna supercontinent. The formation of the initial magmas of the Kodar granitoids was related to the mantle–crustal interaction during the mixing of primary mafic mantle magmas or their derivatives with anatectic melts derived through partial melting of the Archean lower continental crust of the region under the thermal influence of mafic magma. The crustal component in the source clearly predominates and has a heterogeneous nature. The mantle component is mainly represented by ancient enriched mantle, with the possible contribution of the OIB–type component.
ISSN:0869-5911
1556-2085
DOI:10.1134/S0869591121030036