Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process
Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical papers 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3666 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 3649 |
container_title | Chemical papers |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Al Ani, Zainab Gujarathi, Ashish M. Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza Al Wahaibi, Talal |
description | Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2531293784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2531293784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOOi8gKuAW6O5tE27lGG8wIAbXYckTSTSJjVJR8Z38J3NOII7N-fC-f__wAfABcHXBGN-kwhpugZhShAmdUcQOQILwliDOszrY7CgdVsjTjt8CpYpOYWrijPaNnwBvtbbMMzZBS_jDo7zkB3S0WUTnYRhym50n3J_hjJNRucEbYgwzYOdo9NQatfDaZA-wxw-ZOzhGKKBRgcfRqevoPFbF4Mfjc9yGHbQRmd8Xwbpe2isdbrsGU4xaJPSOTixckhm-dvPwMvd-nn1gDZP94-r2w3SrG4y6pRStuq40ly3ymilFeFM1kThVlIujSWaStxr1TZUtXUphlV9AcDKzVp2Bi4PueXv-2xSFm9hjr68FLRmhHaMt1VR0YNKx5BSNFZM0Y2FkyBY7MmLA3lRyIsf8oIUEzuYUhH7VxP_ov9xfQNLsowj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531293784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Al Ani, Zainab ; Gujarathi, Ashish M. ; Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza ; Al Wahaibi, Talal</creator><creatorcontrib>Al Ani, Zainab ; Gujarathi, Ashish M. ; Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza ; Al Wahaibi, Talal</creatorcontrib><description>Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2585-7290</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0366-6352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1336-9075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Air flow ; Biochemistry ; Biotechnology ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Exergy ; Flow velocity ; Genetic algorithms ; Greenhouse gases ; Identification methods ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Materials Science ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Multiple criterion ; Multiple objective analysis ; Original Paper ; Pareto optimization ; Pareto optimum ; Production costs ; Sorting algorithms ; Sulfuric acid ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>Chemical papers, 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666</ispartof><rights>Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021</rights><rights>Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7621-3948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al Ani, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Wahaibi, Talal</creatorcontrib><title>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</title><title>Chemical papers</title><addtitle>Chem. Pap</addtitle><description>Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Sorting algorithms</subject><subject>Sulfuric acid</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>2585-7290</issn><issn>0366-6352</issn><issn>1336-9075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOOi8gKuAW6O5tE27lGG8wIAbXYckTSTSJjVJR8Z38J3NOII7N-fC-f__wAfABcHXBGN-kwhpugZhShAmdUcQOQILwliDOszrY7CgdVsjTjt8CpYpOYWrijPaNnwBvtbbMMzZBS_jDo7zkB3S0WUTnYRhym50n3J_hjJNRucEbYgwzYOdo9NQatfDaZA-wxw-ZOzhGKKBRgcfRqevoPFbF4Mfjc9yGHbQRmd8Xwbpe2isdbrsGU4xaJPSOTixckhm-dvPwMvd-nn1gDZP94-r2w3SrG4y6pRStuq40ly3ymilFeFM1kThVlIujSWaStxr1TZUtXUphlV9AcDKzVp2Bi4PueXv-2xSFm9hjr68FLRmhHaMt1VR0YNKx5BSNFZM0Y2FkyBY7MmLA3lRyIsf8oIUEzuYUhH7VxP_ov9xfQNLsowj</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Al Ani, Zainab</creator><creator>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</creator><creator>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</creator><creator>Al Wahaibi, Talal</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-3948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</title><author>Al Ani, Zainab ; Gujarathi, Ashish M. ; Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza ; Al Wahaibi, Talal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Sorting algorithms</topic><topic>Sulfuric acid</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al Ani, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Wahaibi, Talal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemical papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al Ani, Zainab</au><au>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</au><au>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</au><au>Al Wahaibi, Talal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</atitle><jtitle>Chemical papers</jtitle><stitle>Chem. Pap</stitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3649</spage><epage>3666</epage><pages>3649-3666</pages><issn>2585-7290</issn><issn>0366-6352</issn><eissn>1336-9075</eissn><abstract>Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-3948</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2585-7290 |
ispartof | Chemical papers, 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666 |
issn | 2585-7290 0366-6352 1336-9075 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2531293784 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acidification Air flow Biochemistry Biotechnology Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Chemistry/Food Science Exergy Flow velocity Genetic algorithms Greenhouse gases Identification methods Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering Materials Science Medicinal Chemistry Multiple criterion Multiple objective analysis Original Paper Pareto optimization Pareto optimum Production costs Sorting algorithms Sulfuric acid Water flow |
title | Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A16%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolutionary%20multi-criteria%20optimization%20aspects%20for%20sulfuric%20acid%20plant%20toward%20more%20economic,%20environmentally%20friendly%20and%20efficient%20process&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20papers&rft.au=Al%20Ani,%20Zainab&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3649&rft.epage=3666&rft.pages=3649-3666&rft.issn=2585-7290&rft.eissn=1336-9075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531293784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531293784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |