Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process

Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical papers 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666
Hauptverfasser: Al Ani, Zainab, Gujarathi, Ashish M., Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza, Al Wahaibi, Talal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3666
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3649
container_title Chemical papers
container_volume 75
creator Al Ani, Zainab
Gujarathi, Ashish M.
Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza
Al Wahaibi, Talal
description Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2531293784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2531293784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOOi8gKuAW6O5tE27lGG8wIAbXYckTSTSJjVJR8Z38J3NOII7N-fC-f__wAfABcHXBGN-kwhpugZhShAmdUcQOQILwliDOszrY7CgdVsjTjt8CpYpOYWrijPaNnwBvtbbMMzZBS_jDo7zkB3S0WUTnYRhym50n3J_hjJNRucEbYgwzYOdo9NQatfDaZA-wxw-ZOzhGKKBRgcfRqevoPFbF4Mfjc9yGHbQRmd8Xwbpe2isdbrsGU4xaJPSOTixckhm-dvPwMvd-nn1gDZP94-r2w3SrG4y6pRStuq40ly3ymilFeFM1kThVlIujSWaStxr1TZUtXUphlV9AcDKzVp2Bi4PueXv-2xSFm9hjr68FLRmhHaMt1VR0YNKx5BSNFZM0Y2FkyBY7MmLA3lRyIsf8oIUEzuYUhH7VxP_ov9xfQNLsowj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531293784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Al Ani, Zainab ; Gujarathi, Ashish M. ; Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza ; Al Wahaibi, Talal</creator><creatorcontrib>Al Ani, Zainab ; Gujarathi, Ashish M. ; Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza ; Al Wahaibi, Talal</creatorcontrib><description>Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2585-7290</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0366-6352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1336-9075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Air flow ; Biochemistry ; Biotechnology ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Exergy ; Flow velocity ; Genetic algorithms ; Greenhouse gases ; Identification methods ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Materials Science ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Multiple criterion ; Multiple objective analysis ; Original Paper ; Pareto optimization ; Pareto optimum ; Production costs ; Sorting algorithms ; Sulfuric acid ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>Chemical papers, 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666</ispartof><rights>Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021</rights><rights>Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7621-3948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al Ani, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Wahaibi, Talal</creatorcontrib><title>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</title><title>Chemical papers</title><addtitle>Chem. Pap</addtitle><description>Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Sorting algorithms</subject><subject>Sulfuric acid</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>2585-7290</issn><issn>0366-6352</issn><issn>1336-9075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOOi8gKuAW6O5tE27lGG8wIAbXYckTSTSJjVJR8Z38J3NOII7N-fC-f__wAfABcHXBGN-kwhpugZhShAmdUcQOQILwliDOszrY7CgdVsjTjt8CpYpOYWrijPaNnwBvtbbMMzZBS_jDo7zkB3S0WUTnYRhym50n3J_hjJNRucEbYgwzYOdo9NQatfDaZA-wxw-ZOzhGKKBRgcfRqevoPFbF4Mfjc9yGHbQRmd8Xwbpe2isdbrsGU4xaJPSOTixckhm-dvPwMvd-nn1gDZP94-r2w3SrG4y6pRStuq40ly3ymilFeFM1kThVlIujSWaStxr1TZUtXUphlV9AcDKzVp2Bi4PueXv-2xSFm9hjr68FLRmhHaMt1VR0YNKx5BSNFZM0Y2FkyBY7MmLA3lRyIsf8oIUEzuYUhH7VxP_ov9xfQNLsowj</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Al Ani, Zainab</creator><creator>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</creator><creator>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</creator><creator>Al Wahaibi, Talal</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-3948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</title><author>Al Ani, Zainab ; Gujarathi, Ashish M. ; Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza ; Al Wahaibi, Talal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9bbbf497bc7c8becbcb173a51b08a27aef1c2a0dcb862b8562be34d2903aefff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Sorting algorithms</topic><topic>Sulfuric acid</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al Ani, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Wahaibi, Talal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemical papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al Ani, Zainab</au><au>Gujarathi, Ashish M.</au><au>Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza</au><au>Al Wahaibi, Talal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process</atitle><jtitle>Chemical papers</jtitle><stitle>Chem. Pap</stitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3649</spage><epage>3666</epage><pages>3649-3666</pages><issn>2585-7290</issn><issn>0366-6352</issn><eissn>1336-9075</eissn><abstract>Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-3948</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2585-7290
ispartof Chemical papers, 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666
issn 2585-7290
0366-6352
1336-9075
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2531293784
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acidification
Air flow
Biochemistry
Biotechnology
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chemistry/Food Science
Exergy
Flow velocity
Genetic algorithms
Greenhouse gases
Identification methods
Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
Materials Science
Medicinal Chemistry
Multiple criterion
Multiple objective analysis
Original Paper
Pareto optimization
Pareto optimum
Production costs
Sorting algorithms
Sulfuric acid
Water flow
title Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A16%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolutionary%20multi-criteria%20optimization%20aspects%20for%20sulfuric%20acid%20plant%20toward%20more%20economic,%20environmentally%20friendly%20and%20efficient%20process&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20papers&rft.au=Al%20Ani,%20Zainab&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3649&rft.epage=3666&rft.pages=3649-3666&rft.issn=2585-7290&rft.eissn=1336-9075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531293784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531293784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true