Evolutionary multi-criteria optimization aspects for sulfuric acid plant toward more economic, environmentally friendly and efficient process

Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical papers 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.3649-3666
Hauptverfasser: Al Ani, Zainab, Gujarathi, Ashish M., Vakili-Nezhaad, G. Reza, Al Wahaibi, Talal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Acid and greenhouse gaseous emissions as well as the physical exergy are massive challenges associated with sulfuric acid plants. Minimizing these critical problems along with maximizing the economic efficiency of the plant is of important concern. A selected plant was simulated with Aspen Plus and used for this multi-objective optimization (MOO) study. MOO was carried out with excel-based MOO with elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Decision variables such as air, steam- and water- flow rates, reactors- and columns- operating pressures were considered to get the Pareto optimal front for the selected objectives (product sales, utility cost, total production cost, global warming potential, acidification potential, and physical exergy). It was found that air, steam and water flow rates have a strong impact in most cases. For example, FCI is reduced from 4.37E + 07 to 4.00E + 07 $ as air flow rate went from 3.62E + 03 to 3.40E + 03 kmol/hr in case 1. While the other objective in case 1, AP, increased from 1.68E + 05 to 2.98E + 05. The obtained trade-offs were ranked using Net Flow Method to identify the best solutions. The attained Pareto fronts provided set of equally good- and non-dominated solutions corresponding to the conflicting objectives involved in the process.
ISSN:2585-7290
0366-6352
1336-9075
DOI:10.1007/s11696-021-01591-1