ERISA LITIGATION: Dot the Is and Cross the Ts: Consequences of Failing to Describe Internal Claims Appeal Procedures

While the existence of internal administrative remedies is usually presupposed, the recent Wallace v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc. case highlights the consequences of failing to describe these remedies in the plan document.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of pension benefits 2020-10, Vol.28 (1), p.68-69
Hauptverfasser:	Jacobowitz, Meredith, Brockman, W Bard
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Appeals ERISA Federal court decisions State court decisions
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	While the existence of internal administrative remedies is usually presupposed, the recent Wallace v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc. case highlights the consequences of failing to describe these remedies in the plan document.
ISSN:	1069-4064