International collaboration framework for the calculation of performance loss rates: Data quality, benchmarks, and trends (towards a uniform methodology)

The IEA PVPS Task 13 group, experts who focus on photovoltaic performance, operation, and reliability from several leading R&D centers, universities, and industrial companies, is developing a framework for the calculation of performance loss rates of a large number of commercial and research pho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in photovoltaics 2021-06, Vol.29 (6), p.573-602
Hauptverfasser: Lindig, Sascha, Moser, David, Curran, Alan J., Rath, Kunal, Khalilnejad, Arash, French, Roger H., Herz, Magnus, Müller, Björn, Makrides, George, Georghiou, George, Livera, Andreas, Richter, Mauricio, Ascencio‐Vásquez, Julián, Iseghem, Mike, Meftah, Mohammed, Jordan, Dirk, Deline, Chris, Sark, Wilfried, Stein, Joshua S., Theristis, Marios, Meyers, Bennet, Baumgartner, Franz, Luo, Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The IEA PVPS Task 13 group, experts who focus on photovoltaic performance, operation, and reliability from several leading R&D centers, universities, and industrial companies, is developing a framework for the calculation of performance loss rates of a large number of commercial and research photovoltaic (PV) power plants and their related weather data coming across various climatic zones. The general steps to calculate the performance loss rate are (i) input data cleaning and grading; (ii) data filtering; (iii) performance metric selection, corrections, and aggregation; and finally, (iv) application of a statistical modeling method to determine the performance loss rate value. In this study, several high‐quality power and irradiance datasets have been shared, and the participants of the study were asked to calculate the performance loss rate of each individual system using their preferred methodologies. The data are used for benchmarking activities and to define capabilities and uncertainties of all the various methods. The combination of data filtering, metrics (performance ratio or power based), and statistical modeling methods are benchmarked in terms of (i) their deviation from the average value and (ii) their uncertainty, standard error, and confidence intervals. It was observed that careful data filtering is an essential foundation for reliable performance loss rate calculations. Furthermore, the selection of the calculation steps filter/metric/statistical method is highly dependent on one another, and the steps should not be assessed individually. This work presents a large‐scale performance loss rate determination methodology benchmarking comparison. It has been shown that each individual calculation step, namely, data filtering/performance metric selection/application of a statistical modeling method for the performance loss rate determination, influences the final result. Careful input data filtering was shown to be of essential importance. Besides, the individual steps highly depend on one another and cannot be considered in isolation.
ISSN:1062-7995
1099-159X
DOI:10.1002/pip.3397