Structural behavior of MRPC beams exposure to riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars

Reinforced polymer bars could potentially be used with fiber as a strengthening technology in MRPC. The main objective of this paper is to study the influence development of the flexural behavior of MRPC beams after 120 days of virtual corrosion-exposure in riverine simulated circumstances using GFR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2021-02, Vol.1076 (1), p.12103
Hauptverfasser: Wenas, Abeer Hassan, AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha, Mushatat, Haider Amer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12103
container_title IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering
container_volume 1076
creator Wenas, Abeer Hassan
AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha
Mushatat, Haider Amer
description Reinforced polymer bars could potentially be used with fiber as a strengthening technology in MRPC. The main objective of this paper is to study the influence development of the flexural behavior of MRPC beams after 120 days of virtual corrosion-exposure in riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars. Nine beams were tested via a two-point loading method up to failure, 1200 mm long, (200x100mm) cross-section. The water/binder is chosen to be 0.14 by weight. Silica fume was replaced by 8% weight of cement. The dose of superplasticizer used to the total binder weight was 0.41 percent. Three types of flexural reinforcement ratios were used individually per each cross-section; GFRP, CFRP, and traditional steel rebar, with a nominal diameter of 10 mm. The compressive strength of MRPC is 80 MPa. The experimental evidence indicates that GFRP and CFRP bars used with MRPC have higher tensile strength and anti-corroded bars. Also, the load results indicate that CFRP bars are more efficient than GFRP bars and steel rebar. Finally, the behavior of MRPC beams neither GFRP and CFRP bars submerged in Tigris river water did not chemically affect. The author recommended replacing steel rebar with GFRP and CFRP bars to improved structural behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2513022460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2513022460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1643-7ca5f4ed1ded28f1838e6bb77e144cfea226835df761ac421c8e218bdca1a163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKe_wYDPs7lpmmSPUtwUJo65B99Cmt7OjrWdSTP037sy2dM93HM4Bz5C7oE9AtM6AZWpiZ5OPxNgSiaQMODA0gsyOjuXZ63hmtyEsGVMKiHYiGw-eh9dH73d0QK_7KHuPO0q-rZa5seHbQLFn30Xokfad9TXB_R1izTUTdzZHkvqau9iE3rbOgw0hrrd0PlstaS2LWk-iML6cEuuKrsLePd_x2Q9e17nL5PF-_w1f1pMHEiRTpSzWSWwhBJLrivQqUZZFEohCOEqtJxLnWZlpSRYJzg4jRx0UToLFmQ6Jg-n2r3vviOG3my76NvjouEZpIxzIdkxpU4p57sQPFZm7-vG-l8DzAxQzYDLDOjMANWAOUFN_wCpHmty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513022460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural behavior of MRPC beams exposure to riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wenas, Abeer Hassan ; AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha ; Mushatat, Haider Amer</creator><creatorcontrib>Wenas, Abeer Hassan ; AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha ; Mushatat, Haider Amer</creatorcontrib><description>Reinforced polymer bars could potentially be used with fiber as a strengthening technology in MRPC. The main objective of this paper is to study the influence development of the flexural behavior of MRPC beams after 120 days of virtual corrosion-exposure in riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars. Nine beams were tested via a two-point loading method up to failure, 1200 mm long, (200x100mm) cross-section. The water/binder is chosen to be 0.14 by weight. Silica fume was replaced by 8% weight of cement. The dose of superplasticizer used to the total binder weight was 0.41 percent. Three types of flexural reinforcement ratios were used individually per each cross-section; GFRP, CFRP, and traditional steel rebar, with a nominal diameter of 10 mm. The compressive strength of MRPC is 80 MPa. The experimental evidence indicates that GFRP and CFRP bars used with MRPC have higher tensile strength and anti-corroded bars. Also, the load results indicate that CFRP bars are more efficient than GFRP bars and steel rebar. Finally, the behavior of MRPC beams neither GFRP and CFRP bars submerged in Tigris river water did not chemically affect. The author recommended replacing steel rebar with GFRP and CFRP bars to improved structural behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Bars ; Compressive strength ; Cross-sections ; Glass fiber reinforced plastics ; Rebar ; Reinforcing steels ; Silica fume ; Silicon dioxide ; Structural behavior ; Superplasticizers ; Tensile strength ; Weight</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2021-02, Vol.1076 (1), p.12103</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1643-7ca5f4ed1ded28f1838e6bb77e144cfea226835df761ac421c8e218bdca1a163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wenas, Abeer Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushatat, Haider Amer</creatorcontrib><title>Structural behavior of MRPC beams exposure to riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><description>Reinforced polymer bars could potentially be used with fiber as a strengthening technology in MRPC. The main objective of this paper is to study the influence development of the flexural behavior of MRPC beams after 120 days of virtual corrosion-exposure in riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars. Nine beams were tested via a two-point loading method up to failure, 1200 mm long, (200x100mm) cross-section. The water/binder is chosen to be 0.14 by weight. Silica fume was replaced by 8% weight of cement. The dose of superplasticizer used to the total binder weight was 0.41 percent. Three types of flexural reinforcement ratios were used individually per each cross-section; GFRP, CFRP, and traditional steel rebar, with a nominal diameter of 10 mm. The compressive strength of MRPC is 80 MPa. The experimental evidence indicates that GFRP and CFRP bars used with MRPC have higher tensile strength and anti-corroded bars. Also, the load results indicate that CFRP bars are more efficient than GFRP bars and steel rebar. Finally, the behavior of MRPC beams neither GFRP and CFRP bars submerged in Tigris river water did not chemically affect. The author recommended replacing steel rebar with GFRP and CFRP bars to improved structural behavior.</description><subject>Bars</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Cross-sections</subject><subject>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Rebar</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Silica fume</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Structural behavior</subject><subject>Superplasticizers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKe_wYDPs7lpmmSPUtwUJo65B99Cmt7OjrWdSTP037sy2dM93HM4Bz5C7oE9AtM6AZWpiZ5OPxNgSiaQMODA0gsyOjuXZ63hmtyEsGVMKiHYiGw-eh9dH73d0QK_7KHuPO0q-rZa5seHbQLFn30Xokfad9TXB_R1izTUTdzZHkvqau9iE3rbOgw0hrrd0PlstaS2LWk-iML6cEuuKrsLePd_x2Q9e17nL5PF-_w1f1pMHEiRTpSzWSWwhBJLrivQqUZZFEohCOEqtJxLnWZlpSRYJzg4jRx0UToLFmQ6Jg-n2r3vviOG3my76NvjouEZpIxzIdkxpU4p57sQPFZm7-vG-l8DzAxQzYDLDOjMANWAOUFN_wCpHmty</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Wenas, Abeer Hassan</creator><creator>AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha</creator><creator>Mushatat, Haider Amer</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Structural behavior of MRPC beams exposure to riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars</title><author>Wenas, Abeer Hassan ; AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha ; Mushatat, Haider Amer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1643-7ca5f4ed1ded28f1838e6bb77e144cfea226835df761ac421c8e218bdca1a163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bars</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Cross-sections</topic><topic>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Rebar</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Silica fume</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Structural behavior</topic><topic>Superplasticizers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wenas, Abeer Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushatat, Haider Amer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wenas, Abeer Hassan</au><au>AbdulKareem, Wael Shahadha</au><au>Mushatat, Haider Amer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural behavior of MRPC beams exposure to riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>1076</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12103</spage><pages>12103-</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>Reinforced polymer bars could potentially be used with fiber as a strengthening technology in MRPC. The main objective of this paper is to study the influence development of the flexural behavior of MRPC beams after 120 days of virtual corrosion-exposure in riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars. Nine beams were tested via a two-point loading method up to failure, 1200 mm long, (200x100mm) cross-section. The water/binder is chosen to be 0.14 by weight. Silica fume was replaced by 8% weight of cement. The dose of superplasticizer used to the total binder weight was 0.41 percent. Three types of flexural reinforcement ratios were used individually per each cross-section; GFRP, CFRP, and traditional steel rebar, with a nominal diameter of 10 mm. The compressive strength of MRPC is 80 MPa. The experimental evidence indicates that GFRP and CFRP bars used with MRPC have higher tensile strength and anti-corroded bars. Also, the load results indicate that CFRP bars are more efficient than GFRP bars and steel rebar. Finally, the behavior of MRPC beams neither GFRP and CFRP bars submerged in Tigris river water did not chemically affect. The author recommended replacing steel rebar with GFRP and CFRP bars to improved structural behavior.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012103</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1757-8981
ispartof IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2021-02, Vol.1076 (1), p.12103
issn 1757-8981
1757-899X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2513022460
source IOP Publishing Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Bars
Compressive strength
Cross-sections
Glass fiber reinforced plastics
Rebar
Reinforcing steels
Silica fume
Silicon dioxide
Structural behavior
Superplasticizers
Tensile strength
Weight
title Structural behavior of MRPC beams exposure to riverine simulated circumstances using GFRP and CFRP bars
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20behavior%20of%20MRPC%20beams%20exposure%20to%20riverine%20simulated%20circumstances%20using%20GFRP%20and%20CFRP%20bars&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Wenas,%20Abeer%20Hassan&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=1076&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12103&rft.pages=12103-&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2513022460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513022460&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true