Multilayer Perceptron Model for the prediction of corrosion rate of Aluminium Alloy 5083 in seawater via different training algorithms
Corrosion inhibitor is often opted as a corrosion protection method for various industries worldwide. The development of eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor has become a trending concern due to the various environmental regulations impose by several countries. However, a laboratory testing would be suc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2021-01, Vol.646 (1), p.12058 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Corrosion inhibitor is often opted as a corrosion protection method for various industries worldwide. The development of eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor has become a trending concern due to the various environmental regulations impose by several countries. However, a laboratory testing would be such a tedious, costly and time-consuming process. Therefore, artificial neural network (ANN) has been used extensively to predict the verdict based on the experimental values. In this study, 3-layered Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models were developed with 3 inputs (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Ω.cm
2
), (Potentiodynamic polarization, A/cm
2
), (weight loss, %), and one output (corrosion rate, mm.yr
−1
). The data were divided into three parts; 70%, 15%, and 15% for model development, model validation and model testing, respectively. Three training algorithms were tested during the model development, including the Levenberg-Marquadt (LM), Bayesian Regularization (BR), and Scale Conjugate Gradient (SCG). Results revealed that the best MLP models during the development were using neuron number 4 (r = 0.99272), 6 (r = 0.99155), and 2 (r = 0.98624) for LM, BR and SCG, respectively. Among the three training algorithms, LM is opted as the best training algorithm for the corrosion rate prediction which executed high correlation coefficient (R) values during development (R = 0.99272), validation (R = 0.99905), and testing (R = 0.97908). These findings will be an essential tool for the model development with the sole purposes of predicting the corrosion rate in line to ensure the exact time for repair and maintenance schedule. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-1307 1755-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1755-1315/646/1/012058 |