Experimental tests of sub-surface reflectors as an explanation for the ANITA anomalous events
The balloon-borne ANITA [1] experiment is designed to detect ultra-high energy neutrinos via radio emissions produced by in-ice showers. Although initially purposed for interactions within the Antarctic ice sheet, ANITA also demonstrated the ability to self-trigger on radio emissions from ultra-high...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics 2021-04, Vol.2021 (4), p.16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The balloon-borne ANITA [1] experiment is designed to detect
ultra-high energy neutrinos via radio emissions produced by in-ice
showers. Although initially purposed for interactions within the
Antarctic ice sheet, ANITA also demonstrated the ability to
self-trigger on radio emissions from ultra-high energy charged
cosmic rays [2] (CR) interacting in the Earth's atmosphere. For
showers produced above the Antarctic ice sheet, reflection of the
down-coming radio signals at the Antarctic surface should result in
a polarity inversion prior to subsequent observation at the ∼35–40
km altitude ANITA gondola. Based on data taken during the ANITA-1
and ANITA-3 flights, ANITA published two anomalous instances of
upcoming cosmic-rays with measured polarity opposite the remaining
sample of ∼50 UHECR signals [3, 4]. The steep observed upwards
incidence angles (25–30 degrees relative to the horizontal) require
non-Standard Model physics if these events are due to in-ice
neutrino interactions, as the Standard Model cross-section would
otherwise prohibit neutrinos from penetrating the long required
chord of Earth. Shoemaker et al. [5] posit that glaciological
effects may explain the steep observed anomalous events. We herein
consider the scenarios offered by Shoemaker et al. and find them to
be disfavored by extant ANITA and HiCal experimental data. We note
that the recent report of four additional near-horizon anomalous
ANITA-4 events [6], at >3σ significance, are incompatible with
their model, which requires significant signal transmission into the
ice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-7516 1475-7516 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/016 |