Scientifically Defensible Fish Conservation and Recovery Plans: Addressing Diffuse Threats and Developing Rigorous Adaptive Management Plans

We discuss the importance of addressing diffuse threats to long‐term species and habitat viability in fish conservation and recovery planning. In the Pacific Northwest, USA, salmonid management plans have typically focused on degraded freshwater habitat, dams, fish passage, harvest rates, and hatche...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fisheries 2016-06, Vol.41 (6), p.276-285
Hauptverfasser: Maas‐Hebner, Kathleen G., Schreck, Carl, Hughes, Robert M., Yeakley, J. Alan, Molina, Nancy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We discuss the importance of addressing diffuse threats to long‐term species and habitat viability in fish conservation and recovery planning. In the Pacific Northwest, USA, salmonid management plans have typically focused on degraded freshwater habitat, dams, fish passage, harvest rates, and hatchery releases. However, such plans inadequately address threats related to human population and economic growth, intra‐ and interspecific competition, and changes in climate, ocean, and estuarine conditions. Based on reviews conducted on eight conservation and/or recovery plans, we found that though threats resulting from such changes are difficult to model and/or predict, they are especially important for wide‐ranging diadromous species. Adaptive management is also a critical but often inadequately constructed component of those plans. Adaptive management should be designed to respond to evolving knowledge about the fish and their supporting ecosystems; if done properly, it should help improve conservation efforts by decreasing uncertainty regarding known and diffuse threats. We conclude with a general call for environmental managers and planners to reinvigorate the adaptive management process in future management plans, including more explicitly identifying critical uncertainties, implementing monitoring programs to reduce those uncertainties, and explicitly stating what management actions will occur when pre‐identified trigger points are reached. Se discute la importancia de incorporar amenazas extendidas a la viabilidad de largo plazo de especies y hábitats para planear esfuerzos de conservación y recuperación. En el Pacífico noroeste de los EE.UU., los planes de manejo de salmónidos comúnmente se han enfocado en hábitats degradados de agua dulce, presas, pasajes para peces, tasas de cosecha y liberación de individuos cultivados. No obstante, dichos planes no abordan adecuadamente las amenazas relacionadas con la población humana y el crecimiento económico, la competencia intra e interespecífica, cambios en el clima ni las condiciones oceánicas o estuarinas. Sobre la base de una revisión llevada a cabo en ocho planes de conservación y/o recuperación, encontramos que pese a que las amenazas que se derivan de estos cambios son difíciles de modelar y/o predecir, éstas resultan ser particularmente importantes para especies diádromas de amplia distribución. Dentro de los planes se encontró que el manejo adaptativo es, asimismo, un componente crítico pero frecuentem
ISSN:0363-2415
1548-8446
1548-8675
DOI:10.1080/03632415.2016.1175346