Short‐term exposure to ambient air pollution in association with COVID‐19 of two clusters in South Korea
Objectives This study aimed to examine the association between six air pollutants and COVID‐19 infection in two main clusters, which accounted for 83% of total confirmed cases in Korea. Methods We collected the data on daily confirmed cases between February 24, 2020 and September 12, 2020. Data on s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical medicine & international health 2021-04, Vol.26 (4), p.478-491 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
This study aimed to examine the association between six air pollutants and COVID‐19 infection in two main clusters, which accounted for 83% of total confirmed cases in Korea.
Methods
We collected the data on daily confirmed cases between February 24, 2020 and September 12, 2020. Data on six air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, O3, NO2, CO and SO2) and four meteorological factors (temperature, wind speed, humidity and air pressure) were obtained on seven days prior to the research period. The generalised additive model and the distributed lag nonlinear model were applied to generate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations. Pooled estimates for clusters were obtained by applying a random‐effects model.
Results
We found that NO2 concentration was positively associated with daily confirmed cases in both Seoul‐Gyeonggi and Daegu‐Gyeongbuk clusters, with RRs (95% CIs) of 1.22 (1.03–1.44) and 1.66 (1.25–2.19), respectively. However, SO2 concentration was observed to be associated with daily confirmed cases in the Seoul‐Gyeonggi cluster only (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.10–1.54), whereas PM2.5 and CO concentrations were observed to be associated with daily confirmed cases in the Daegu‐Gyeongbuk cluster only (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02–1.27 and RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.15–1.48, respectively).
Conclusions
Our data found that NO2 concentration was positively associated with daily confirmed cases in both clusters, whereas the effect of PM2.5, CO and SO2 on COVID‐19 infection in two clusters was different. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1360-2276 1365-3156 |
DOI: | 10.1111/tmi.13538 |