0820 Meta-Analysis of the Association of Age and Actigraphy-Assessed Sleep Across the Lifespan

Abstract Introduction Sleep quantity and continuity vary across the lifespan. Actigraphy is reliable, ecologically valid, and is the most widely-used behavioral measure of sleep in research and personal health monitoring. The extent to which age is associated with actigraphy-assessed sleep has not b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A312-A313
Hauptverfasser: Bowman, M A, Buysse, D J, Marsland, A L, Wright, A G, Foust, J, Mehra, R, Srinivasan, S, Kohli, N, Carroll, L, Jasper, A, Hall, M H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Sleep quantity and continuity vary across the lifespan. Actigraphy is reliable, ecologically valid, and is the most widely-used behavioral measure of sleep in research and personal health monitoring. The extent to which age is associated with actigraphy-assessed sleep has not been evaluated across the lifespan. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the associations between age and actigraphy-assessed sleep in relatively healthy individuals. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PsycINFO using “actigraphy” and “sleep” terms provided 7,079 titles/abstracts, which were screened to exclude studies of only individuals with mental health disorders, medical conditions, sleep disorders, or shift workers. We evaluated 1,379 full-text articles for reports on the association between age and actigraphy-assessed sleep duration, efficiency, timing, and/or regularity. Overall, 88 articles met these criteria (182 effect sizes; N=18,443). Four meta-analyses were conducted, examining sleep duration (k=86), sleep efficiency (k=58), bedtime (k=27), and wake-up time (k=11). There were insufficient numbers of studies (less than 5) to evaluate sleep midpoint or sleep regularity. We tested continent of the study, study design, actigraphy device type, and number of nights of data collection as moderators of meta-analytic associations. Results With increasing age, sleep duration was shorter (r = -0.13) and sleep efficiency was lower (r = -0.06). Bedtime was later with age for ages 6-21 (r = 0.31) and earlier for ages 22 and up (r = -0.65). Wake-up time was not associated with age for ages 6-21 (r = 0.20) but was earlier with increasing age for ages 22 and up (r = -0.71). The strength of these associations was modified by continent and study design, but not by type of actigraphy device or number of nights of data collection. Conclusion Weak associations between age and actigraphy-assessed duration and efficiency suggest that inadequate sleep quantity or poor sleep continuity should not be dismissed as typical consequences of aging. Large associations between age and sleep timing, despite a small literature, highlights a promising area for further study, particularly to determine the age at which sleep timing shifts from delaying to advancing. Support MAB was supported by T32 HL07560.
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.816