1185 Developing A Care Pathway For Insomnia In Older Adults And Adults With Dementia: Results Of A Consensus Meeting

Abstract Introduction Insomnia among older adults and dementia patients carries a high public health burden. Yet, treatment is inconsistent or absent. Standardized, programmatic carepaths can be implemented in clinics/systems/communities to address this after tailoring to local environments. To dete...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A452-A453
Hauptverfasser: Benca, R, Ferziger, R, Wickwire, E M, Bertisch, S, Biddle, J, Boustani, M, Culpepper, L, Gooneratne, N, Lett, J, Manderscheid, R, Mehra, R, Reynolds, C, Grandner, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Insomnia among older adults and dementia patients carries a high public health burden. Yet, treatment is inconsistent or absent. Standardized, programmatic carepaths can be implemented in clinics/systems/communities to address this after tailoring to local environments. To determine what elements should be included, a consensus meeting was convened, which included discussion, voting on components, and further consensus-building among diverse stakeholders. Methods Participants represented a wide range of stakeholders and specialties, including academic research, clinical care, industry, government, payors, sleep medicine, primary care, geriatrics, psychiatry, neurology, nursing, pharmacy, quality, and implementation science. 27 statements regarding key components of carepaths for insomnia in elderly and dementia populations were presented and discussed. These represented items addressing identification of patients, screening and assessment, deciding treatment modality and delivery, providing behavioral treatment, providing pharmacotherapy, addressing combined therapy, addressing comorbidities, and incorporating outcome evaluation. All N=20 participants voted individually whether they agreed or disagreed with each statement. Items were scored as 0=strongly agree, 1=agree, 2=disagree, and 3=strongly disagree. Mean scores were evaluated and responses were dichotomized to agree/disagree. Results Despite diversity among attendees, median rate of agreement was 95% (IQR=85-95%). Mean score was 0.69 (SD=0.31). 95%CIs were computed for each proportion and compared to the mean. The following elements were significantly different from the mean (p
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.1179