0476 Readiness and Stages of Change in a Behavioral Sleep Medicine Clinical Sample: From Pre-Contemplation to Struggling to Maintain Change

Abstract Introduction Stages of change in the transtheoretical model are used to assess a patient’s readiness to change, which may help providers tailor behavioral treatment (BT). As research has focused on substance abuse, there is a significant lack of data in individuals presenting for behavioral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A182-A183
Hauptverfasser: Amatrudo, G, Puzino, K, Bourchtein, E, Calhoun, S L, Fernandez-Mendoza, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Stages of change in the transtheoretical model are used to assess a patient’s readiness to change, which may help providers tailor behavioral treatment (BT). As research has focused on substance abuse, there is a significant lack of data in individuals presenting for behavioral sleep medicine (BSM) treatment. Methods 146 consecutive patients (46.1±16.0 years, 61.6% female, 19.9% minority) who were evaluated at the BSM program of Penn State Hershey Sleep Research & Treatment Center completed the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) assessing readiness to change (RtC) and pre-contemplation (P), contemplation (C), preparation/action (A) and struggling to maintain (M) stages of change. Subjects also completed the Insomnia Treatment Acceptability Scale (ITAS) and Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS). Results The average RtC score was 9.4, with 21.9% of the sample in stage P, 56.2% in C and 21.9% in A. The average P (53.2±7.6), C (49.1±10.1), A (48.8±12.3) and M (37.7±9.1) scores suggested an overall “contemplation cluster profile”. Higher RtC (r=0.37), C (r=0.31) and A (r=0.24) scores were associated with greater acceptability of BT, while higher P scores were associated with lower acceptability of BT (r=-0.22). In contrast, higher M scores were associated with greater acceptability of pharmacological treatment (r=0.21) as well as higher DBAS scores, including sleep medication expectations (r=0.23). Conclusion Patients attending a BSM program typically present at a contemplation stage, which indicates intention to start changing sleep behaviors within the next few months with some ambivalence in regards to pros/cons of such change. A significant proportion of patients struggle to maintain change and present with higher acceptability for pharmacological interventions, which may hinder the effectiveness of BT and may require specific therapeutic approaches. Support Department of Psychiatry, Penn State College of Medicine
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.473