0543 Implementing Insomnia Care Paths for Older Adults and People with Dementia
Abstract Introduction Despite the high prevalence of insomnia in older adults and those with dementia, screening and treatment remain inconsistent and suboptimal. Implementing a care path in a health system, though, is difficult. To determine what issues are relevant for implementation, a consensus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A208-A208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Introduction
Despite the high prevalence of insomnia in older adults and those with dementia, screening and treatment remain inconsistent and suboptimal. Implementing a care path in a health system, though, is difficult. To determine what issues are relevant for implementation, a consensus meeting was convened, which included discussion, voting on components, and further consensus-building.
Methods
All N=20 participants, representing a wide range of stakeholders including research, industry, sleep, primary care, implementation science, and others, voted whether they agreed or disagreed with 36 different statements regarding what issues are important for implementing geriatric insomnia care paths. These represented a range of items addressing strategies for identifying and incentivizing stakeholders, identifying patients in most need and who would receive benefit, addressing comorbidities and multiple specialties, understanding how specific organizations make decisions about and changes to care, size and scope of the care path, determining the process for implementation, how it will improve outcomes, addressing specific needs of primary care, and addressing costs, reimbursements, and liabilities. Items were scored as 0=strongly agree, 1=agree, 2=disagree, and 3=strongly disagree. Mean scores were evaluated and responses were dichotomized to agree/disagree).
Results
Despite the diversity among attendees, median rate of agreement for was 95% (IQR=90-95%). All items were endorsed by >=80% of respondents. Mean score was 0.48 (SD=1.85). 95%CIs were computed for each proportion and compared to the mean. The only item that significantly differed from the mean score indicated that understanding benefits of a care path to the general community is less important of an issue than others (M=0.85).
Conclusion
Implementing an insomnia care path for older adults in an institution will likely require addressing a wide range of issues, including questions about stakeholders, the health system/context, patients, and practical considerations.
Support
Merck Research Labs provided support |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-8105 1550-9109 |
DOI: | 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.540 |