0637 Comparison of AHI and ESS Outcomes Between Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Sleep Surgery versus Upper Airway Stimulation

Abstract Introduction Single or multi-level soft tissue surgical interventions are common options for CPAP-intolerant patients with OSA. Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) is an alternative option using an implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator. We compared patient outcomes between traditional sleep s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A243-A243
Hauptverfasser: Huntley, C, Doghramji, K, Tschopp, K, Tschopp, S, Jardin, P B, Heiser, C, Schwab, R, Thaler, E, Jenks, C, Walia, H, Kominsky, A, Kezirian, E, Waxman, J, Lin, H, Boon, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Single or multi-level soft tissue surgical interventions are common options for CPAP-intolerant patients with OSA. Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) is an alternative option using an implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator. We compared patient outcomes between traditional sleep surgery (TSS) and UAS. Methods We selected patients who underwent TSS (including palate, oropharynx, tongue, and/or epiglottis-based procedures) for OSA and also met general UAS criteria (BMI≤35, AHI between 15-65, absence of palate concentric collapse during DISE, if available) for chart review. UAS outcomes were collected from the ADHERE international registry. For both groups, post-op AHI was collected, including full-night UAS efficacy studies. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. Results The TSS group (n=284) and UAS group (n=541) were predominantly male and overweight. The TSS group was younger than UAS (47±12 vs 60±11 years, p
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.633