0499 Predictors of Session Attendance in a RCT for CBT-I for Perinatal Insomnia

Abstract Introduction Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia disorder. However, early treatment dropout can negatively impact the success of treatment. In order to design effective strategies to reduce attrition we need to un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A191-A191
Hauptverfasser: Rangel, E, Asarnow, L, Simpson, N, Manber, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia disorder. However, early treatment dropout can negatively impact the success of treatment. In order to design effective strategies to reduce attrition we need to understand predictors of dropout. In this work, we focus on predictors of treatment session attendance among pregnant women in a randomized controlled trial of CBT-I. Methods Participants were 87 pregnant women with insomnia disorder (mean age=32.5, SD=5.1 years) who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of CBT-I and were randomized to the CBT-I arm (5 sessions). We did not include women who did not complete treatment due to early labor. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and demographic questionnaires (age, income, and educational background) were administered at screening. Results Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of number of CBT-I sessions attended during pregnancy. A logistic regression model that included clinical predictors found that the ISI and EPDS were not significant predictors of session attendance. A logistic regression model that included demographic predictors (income, education, and age) was significant (F(3,76)=6.49, p
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.496