Multi-hour and multi-site air quality index forecasting in Beijing using CNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and spatiotemporal clustering

[Display omitted] •The AQI forecasting model uses deep learning and spatiotemporal clustering.•The multiple-site forecasting models were developed for the next 1–6 h.•The overall forecasting for all the stations in Beijing through LSTM is optimal.•Seasonal or spatial clustering-based forecasting is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Expert systems with applications 2021-05, Vol.169, p.114513, Article 114513
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Rui, Liao, Jiaqiang, Yang, Jie, Sun, Wei, Nong, Mingyue, Li, Feipeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •The AQI forecasting model uses deep learning and spatiotemporal clustering.•The multiple-site forecasting models were developed for the next 1–6 h.•The overall forecasting for all the stations in Beijing through LSTM is optimal.•Seasonal or spatial clustering-based forecasting is suitable for a season or cluster.•CNN-LSTM and LSTM generally outperform CNN and BPNN. Effective air quality forecasting models are helpful for timely prevention and control of air pollution. However, the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of air quality have not been fully considered in previous model development. This study attempts to establish a multi-time, multi-site forecasting model of Beijing’s air quality by using deep learning network models based on spatiotemporal clustering and to compare them with a back-propagationneural network (BPNN). For the overall forecasting, the performances in next-hour forecasting were ranked in ascending order of the BPNN, the convolutional neural network (CNN), the long short-term memory (LSTM) model, and the CNN-LSTM, with the LSTM as the optimal model in the multiple-hour forecasting. The performance of the seasonal forecasting was not significantly improved compared to the overall forecasting. For the spatial clustering-based forecasting, cluster 2 forecasting generally outperforms cluster 1 and the overall forecasting. Overall, either the seasonal or the spatial clustering-based forecasting is more suitable for the improvement of the forecasting in a certain season or cluster. In terms of model type, both the CNN-LSTM and the LSTM generally have better performance than the CNN and the BPNN.
ISSN:0957-4174
1873-6793
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114513