De-Globalisation and Decoupling: Post-COVID-19 Myths versus Realities
According to a recent Korean study of re-shoring, just 68 companies have returned their production back to Korea since 2014. A supply chain relying solely on limited local capacity hampered by a local lockdown, by contrast, would be unable to rapidly increase production to meet demand that might ris...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Management and organization review 2021-02, Vol.17 (1), p.29-34 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | According to a recent Korean study of re-shoring, just 68 companies have returned their production back to Korea since 2014. A supply chain relying solely on limited local capacity hampered by a local lockdown, by contrast, would be unable to rapidly increase production to meet demand that might rise by ten or even one hundred times almost overnight. [...]a GVC will be able to identify and access countries where local institutions and infrastructure enable production to be expanded more flexibly and rapidly. [...]it already had relevant international networks, skilled supply chain managers, and experience that could be redeployed at short notice to produce COVID-19 test kits. A report on the negative effects of de-globalising the semiconductor industry by The Boston Consulting Group in March 2020, commissioned by the US Semiconductor Industry Association, concluded that these rules would also result in severe cuts in R&D and capital expenditures by multinationals, and the loss of 15,000 to 40,000 highly skilled direct jobs in the US semiconductor |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1740-8776 1740-8784 |
DOI: | 10.1017/mor.2020.80 |