Correlation between microstructural characteristics and cavitation resistance of Stellite-6 coatings on 17-4 PH stainless steel prepared with supersonic laser deposition and laser cladding

•SLD coating has significantly lower cumulative mass loss and mass loss rate.•Grain size of the SLD coating is smaller than that of the LC coating.•Severe dilution has observed for the LC coating while it is negligible for the SLD specimen.•The average microhardness of the SLD coating is higher than...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of alloys and compounds 2021-04, Vol.860, p.158417, Article 158417
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Qunli, Wu, Lijuan, Zou, Hongsen, Li, Bo, Zhang, Gang, Sun, Jingyong, Wang, Jianjun, Yao, Jianhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•SLD coating has significantly lower cumulative mass loss and mass loss rate.•Grain size of the SLD coating is smaller than that of the LC coating.•Severe dilution has observed for the LC coating while it is negligible for the SLD specimen.•The average microhardness of the SLD coating is higher than that of the LC coating.•The pores formed due to mechanical bonding in SLD coating are initial cavitation position. Stellite-6 coatings were deposited on 17-4 PH stainless steel substrate by supersonic laser deposition (SLD) and laser cladding (LC) to improve cavitation resistance of the substrate. The microstructural characteristics of the as-deposited coatings were analyzed on the basis of OM, SEM, EBSD, XRD, Vicker’s hardness and nano-indentation results. The cavitation erosion performances in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution were comparatively investigated by a vibratory apparatus for the coatings prepared by SLD and LC technologies. The underlying mechanisms for differences of cavitation behavior between these two samples were elucidated in terms of grain size, dilution level, phase composition, hardness, elastic modulus and topographical features of the worn surfaces. Results show that SLD coating has finer grain, lower dilution and higher ratio of hardness to modulus. By analyzing the eroded surfaces, it is found that the pores formed due to mechanical bonding between particles in SLD coating are the priority position of cavitation where bubbles nucleate, grow and collapse. Repeated impact force from bubble collapse produces cracks and makes cracks propagation, leading to particle detachment and finally material removal. Although the porosity of SLD coating is higher than that of LC coating, its content is only less than 0.4%. Therefore, the negative effect of porosity is weaker than the positive effect of grain refinement, low dilution ratio and high hardness on cavitation performance. Consequently, SLD coating has better cavitation resistance than LC coating.
ISSN:0925-8388
1873-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158417