Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis treated with bone-modifying agents

Introduction The incidence rate and risk factors of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) in prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis are not clear. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients’ records of prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis who w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral metabolism 2021-03, Vol.39 (2), p.295-301
Hauptverfasser: Nakai, Yasutomo, Kanaki, Tomohiro, Yamamoto, Akinaru, Tanaka, Ryo, Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki, Nagahara, Akira, Nakayama, Masashi, Kakimoto, Ken-ichi, Ishibashi, Miki, Nishimura, Kazuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The incidence rate and risk factors of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) in prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis are not clear. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients’ records of prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis who were treated with zoledronic acid or denosumab between 1/Dec/2008 and 31/Mar/2019. ARONJ-free survival rate was analyzed with Kaplan–Meier analysis, and risk factors for ARONJ were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard model. Results We identified 124 and 67 patients treated with zoledronic acid and denosumab, respectively. Seventy-six patients were hormone sensitive, and 115 patients were castration resistant when they started bone-modifying agents (BMA). Twenty-eight patients developed ARONJ during the observation period (median: 23 months, range 1–130 months). Their number of doses of BMA ranged 3–69 (median: 21.5). The 2-year ARONJ-free survival rate was 91.1%, and the 5-year ARONJ-free survival rate was 72.5%. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of ARONJ between zoledronic acid and denosumab. However, multivariate analysis revealed that use of denosumab (hazard ratio [HR] 3.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–13.31; p  = 0.0484), serum calcium 
ISSN:0914-8779
1435-5604
DOI:10.1007/s00774-020-01151-9