Oncologic Reappraisal of Bile Duct Resection for Middle-Third Cholangiocarcinoma
Background Although bile duct resection (BDR) in addition to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is considered a surgical approach in patients with middle-third cholangiocarcinoma (MCC), available prognostic information after BDR remains very limited. The aim of this study was to reappraise BDR from the vi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2021-04, Vol.28 (4), p.1990-1999 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Although bile duct resection (BDR) in addition to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is considered a surgical approach in patients with middle-third cholangiocarcinoma (MCC), available prognostic information after BDR remains very limited. The aim of this study was to reappraise BDR from the viewpoint of surgical oncology.
Methods
Patients who underwent BDR or PD for MCC between 2001 and 2010 at 32 Japanese hospitals were included. Clinicopathological factors were retrospectively compared according to surgical procedure to identify a subset cohort who benefited most from BDR.
Results
During the study, 92 patients underwent BDR (
n
= 38) or PD (
n
= 54). BDR was characterized by a shorter operation time, less blood loss, less frequent complications, and lower mortality, than PD. The incidence of positive surgical margins was 26.3% versus 5.6% (
P
= 0.007). The survival rate after BDR was significantly worse than that after PD: 38.8% versus 54.8% at 5 years (
P
= 0.035), and BDR was independently associated with deteriorated survival [hazard ratio (HR), 1.76;
P
= 0.023] by multivariable analysis. In the BDR group, tumor length |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-020-09157-3 |