Numerical‐experimental structural instability analysis of composite tubes considering manufacturing parameters and imperfections

A numerical‐experimental approach to predict structural instability was developed to analyze thin composite tubes produced by filament winding subjected to external pressure. The divergence between mechanical properties characterized through standardized procedures and those of the manufactured comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer composites 2021-03, Vol.42 (3), p.1530-1542
Hauptverfasser: Gerhardt, Eduardo, Marczak, Rogério J., Amico, Sandro C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A numerical‐experimental approach to predict structural instability was developed to analyze thin composite tubes produced by filament winding subjected to external pressure. The divergence between mechanical properties characterized through standardized procedures and those of the manufactured component, influenced by imperfections and manufacturing peculiarities, was considered. A ring compression test and an inverse finite element analysis routine were used for material properties calibration. The routine was based on Tsai's master‐ply concept to deliver feasible constitutive properties values. Based on the numerical and experimental correlation, the implemented approach was considered effective and with good repeatability. A numerical‐experimental approach to predict structural instability was developed to analyze thin composite tubes produced by filament winding subjected to external pressure. The divergence between mechanical properties characterized through standardized procedures and those of the manufactured component, influenced by imperfections and manufacturing peculiarities, was considered. Based on the numerical and experimental correlation, the implemented approach was considered effective and with good repeatability.
ISSN:0272-8397
1548-0569
DOI:10.1002/pc.25921