Distinguishing the Imago Dei from the Soul
This article contends that the ‘structural’ view of the imago Dei , which identifies the image of God with (or as being a property of ) the human soul, requires revision in light of exegesis of Genesis 1, and that philosophical reflection following after such exegesis reveals that the imago Dei need...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heythrop journal 2021-03, Vol.62 (2), p.270-277 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article contends that the ‘structural’ view of the
imago Dei
, which identifies the image of God
with
(or as being a property
of
) the human soul, requires revision in light of exegesis of Genesis 1, and that philosophical reflection following
after
such exegesis reveals that the
imago Dei
needs to be
distinguished
conceptually from the soul. In dialogue with, and (grateful) response to, Joshua Farris ‐ the most recent proponent of the (or ‘a’) structural view, the article counters the position, arguing that instead of the image of God being (a property of)
the human soul
(entailing a human having a body contingently), the emphasis of Scripture is that the image of God
is
a human
in their entirety
(a view entailing their having an immaterial soul). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-1196 1468-2265 |
DOI: | 10.1111/heyj.13040 |