Surprisingly long survival of premature conclusions about naked mole‐rat biology

ABSTRACT Naked mole‐rats express many unusual traits for such a small rodent. Their morphology, social behaviour, physiology, and ageing have been well studied over the past half‐century. Many early findings and speculations about this subterranean species persist in the literature, although some ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2021-04, Vol.96 (2), p.376-393
Hauptverfasser: Braude, Stan, Holtze, Susanne, Begall, Sabine, Brenmoehl, Julia, Burda, Hynek, Dammann, Philip, Marmol, Delphine, Gorshkova, Ekaterina, Henning, Yoshiyuki, Hoeflich, Andreas, Höhn, Annika, Jung, Tobias, Hamo, Dania, Sahm, Arne, Shebzukhov, Yury, Šumbera, Radim, Miwa, Satomi, Vyssokikh, Mikhail Y., Zglinicki, Thomas, Averina, Olga, Hildebrandt, Thomas B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Naked mole‐rats express many unusual traits for such a small rodent. Their morphology, social behaviour, physiology, and ageing have been well studied over the past half‐century. Many early findings and speculations about this subterranean species persist in the literature, although some have been repeatedly questioned or refuted. While the popularity of this species as a natural‐history curiosity, and oversimplified story‐telling in science journalism, might have fuelled the perpetuation of such misconceptions, an accurate understanding of their biology is especially important for this new biomedical model organism. We review 28 of these persistent myths about naked mole‐rat sensory abilities, ecophysiology, social behaviour, development and ageing, and where possible we explain how these misunderstandings came about.
ISSN:1464-7931
1469-185X
DOI:10.1111/brv.12660