How people vote in contests: new findings from Immortal Songs 2
Many important contests, such as job interviews and political debates, are presented in sequential order. Previous studies found serial position effects such that the later presenter has a higher probability of winning. However, no previous studies use both random assignments of contestants and a la...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cultural economics 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.45-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many important contests, such as job interviews and political debates, are presented in sequential order. Previous studies found serial position effects such that the later presenter has a higher probability of winning. However, no previous studies use both random assignments of contestants and a large number of contestants and judges. We use
Immortal Songs 2
, a popular TV program that satisfies both conditions, to confirm the findings of serial position effects. In addition,
Immortal Songs 2
has round-by-round competition rules. The first round is a competition between the first and second contestants. Then, the winner of the first round is announced. The second round is a contest between the winner of the first round and the third contestant. As the rounds continue, in theory, the winner of the previous round should have a higher probability of winning; however, in fact, the second contestant’s probability of winning is always 0.5. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-2545 1573-6997 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10824-020-09386-0 |