Does sperm origin—Ejaculated or testicular—Affect embryo morphokinetic parameters?
Background It is unclear whether sperm origin, either ejaculated or testicular, in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility, affects the timing of the embryo's developmental events evaluated by time‐lapse monitoring and implantation rates. Objective To examine the effect of sperm origin o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Andrology (Oxford) 2021-03, Vol.9 (2), p.632-639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
It is unclear whether sperm origin, either ejaculated or testicular, in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility, affects the timing of the embryo's developmental events evaluated by time‐lapse monitoring and implantation rates.
Objective
To examine the effect of sperm origin on embryo morphokinetics in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility.
Materials and Methods
This study included a retrospective analysis of morphokinetic parameters performed by time‐lapse monitoring between 2013 and 2017. The developmental processes and morphokinetic parameters of 419 embryos obtained from couples with male factor infertility attributed to oligo‐astheno‐teratozoospermia, 158 embryos derived from surgically extracted testicular spermatozoa from couples diagnosed with non‐obstructive azoospermia, and 190 embryos from couples with normal ejaculated spermatozoa and female mechanical factor‐related infertility, were evaluated. A comparison of morphokinetic parameters, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates was performed between the groups with additional analysis in accordance with implantation status.
Results
Embryos from the normal ejaculated spermatozoa and oligo‐astheno‐teratozoospermia patients reached the later morphokinetic milestones—synchronous division (S3) and time to morula (tM)—faster than embryos obtained from testicular spermatozoa. Implantation rate was similar in the normal ejaculated spermatozoa and oligo‐astheno‐teratozoospermia groups (41.9% vs. 45.8%, NS), with higher implantation rate in the oligo‐astheno‐teratozoospermia group compared to the testicular spermatozoa group (45.8% vs. 33.6%, p = 0.02). Comparison of Known Implantation Data (KID) positive (KIDp) and KID negative (KIDn) embryos in each group revealed more rapid development in KIDp embryos in the normal ejaculated spermatozoa and the oligo‐astheno‐teratozoospermia groups, while in the testicular spermatozoa group implanted embryos reached the late morphokinetic milestones (time to 8 cell stage—t8, ECC3, S3, and tM) significantly faster than embryos that failed to implant. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the male factor infertility population, (oligo‐astheno‐teratospermia) (OR = 2.54, p = 0.003) and t8 (OR = 0.95, p = 0.027) were predictive of successful implantation. Male factor infertility embryos that reached the t8 milestone within 48–56 h had favorable implantation rates (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2047-2919 2047-2927 |
DOI: | 10.1111/andr.12952 |