Reply to the Comment on the Paper “Seismic Hazard Analysis of Surface Level, Using Topographic Condition in Northeast of Algeria” by Mohamed Hamdache and José A. Pelàez

We have kindly received the comments by Hamdache and Pelàez on our published paper (Hamidatou et al. 2019 ); This article will give us the opportunity to provide more explanation and clarifications on the methodology followed during our work. We find these comments and critiques helpful for our futu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pure and applied geophysics 2021, Vol.178 (1), p.305-312
Hauptverfasser: Hamidatou, Mouloud, Mohammedi, Yahia, Hallal, Nassim, Yelles-Chaouche, Abdlkrim, Lebdioui, Saad, Thallak, Itharam, Stromeyer, Dietrich, Khemici, Omar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have kindly received the comments by Hamdache and Pelàez on our published paper (Hamidatou et al. 2019 ); This article will give us the opportunity to provide more explanation and clarifications on the methodology followed during our work. We find these comments and critiques helpful for our future works. However, most of them were generated from the misapprehension of the paper by the comment authors. These remarks were mainly based on (1) the misjudging of the seismic source zone model used in relation to the active faults in the study area, (2) suspecting that the probabilistic seismic hazard PGA values were wrongly quoted from their analyses in our work, and (3) the logic tree usage , for which we here provide further general clarifications.
ISSN:0033-4553
1420-9136
DOI:10.1007/s00024-020-02644-4