Dynamic survival prediction combining landmarking with a machine learning ensemble: Methodology and empirical comparison

Dynamic prediction models provide predicted survival probabilities that can be updated over time for an individual as new measurements become available. Two techniques for dynamic survival prediction with longitudinal data dominate the statistical literature: joint modelling and landmarking. There i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society Statistics in society, 2021-01, Vol.184 (1), p.3-30
Hauptverfasser: Tanner, Kamaryn T., Sharples, Linda D., Daniel, Rhian M., Keogh, Ruth H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dynamic prediction models provide predicted survival probabilities that can be updated over time for an individual as new measurements become available. Two techniques for dynamic survival prediction with longitudinal data dominate the statistical literature: joint modelling and landmarking. There is substantial interest in the use of machine learning methods for prediction; however, their use in the context of dynamic survival prediction has been limited. We show how landmarking can be combined with a machine learning ensemble—the Super Learner. The ensemble combines predictions from different machine learning and statistical algorithms with the goal of achieving improved performance. The proposed approach exploits discrete time survival analysis techniques to enable the use of machine learning algorithms for binary outcomes. We discuss practical and statistical considerations involved in implementing the ensemble. The methods are illustrated and compared using longitudinal data from the UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry. Standard landmarking and the landmark Super Learner approach resulted in similar cross‐validated predictive performance, in this case, outperforming joint modelling.
ISSN:0964-1998
1467-985X
DOI:10.1111/rssa.12611