O69 Outcome of direct access IBD physician delivered endoscopy for general practice referrals with suspected IBD

IntroductionPatients with suspected IBD referred by primary care (GP) are traditionally seen in gastroenterology outpatient clinics followed by endoscopic investigations. This 2 phase model leads to delay in diagnosis and treatment, increasing pressure on gastroenterology outpatient services while still requiring endoscopic intervention. Our novel pilot project compared outcomes between direct-access IBD physician-delivered endoscopy versus the traditional clinic model for patients with suspected IBD.MethodA prospective cohort of consecutive patients referred by GP with suspected IBD were triaged either direct to IBD endoscopy (n=50) or to outpatient IBD clinic followed by IBD endoscopy (n=50) at the discretion of 10 gastroenterology consultants grading GP referrals. Data on demographics, faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, endoscopy outcomes, treatment, and follow up was collected. (Group A = direct to IBD endoscopy and Group B = IBD endoscopy via IBD clinic).ResultsBoth groups were age and gender-matched. Group A had a higher mean calprotectin (1363 ug/g vs 302 ug/g) and a higher C-reactive protein (10.6 mg/l vs 4.5 mg/l). In Group A only 38% had a full colonoscopy versus 86% in Group B. Definitive diagnosis and treatment at time of IBD endoscopy took 27 days in Group A versus 212 days in Group B. Treatment with immunomodulators and biologics was similar in both groups but mesalazine and steroid use was higher in Group A due to more severe disease and higher rate of ulcerative colitis, table 1 shows the diagnostic breakdowns from both groups following endoscopy. The IBD pick up was significantly higher in Group A with 70% vs 42%. Endoscopy DNA rate was twice as high in Group B (n=6). The direct to IBD endoscopy pathway resulted in 50 less initial IBD consultant clinics (100% reduction) with a follow-up shift from IBD consultant to IBD nurse clinics.Abstract O69 Table 1Diagnostic breakdown Direct to endoscopy (Group A) IBD endoscopy via IBD clinic (Group B) Ulcerative colitis 44% 10% Crohn’s disease 18% 28% IBDU 8% 4% Diverticulosis/associated segmental colitis 6% 4% IBS 24% 50% Bile sale malabsorption 0% 4% ConclusionTriaging patients referred with suspected IBD directly to IBD physician delivered endoscopy resulted in more than a 26-week reduction in time to diagnosis and treatment while saving 100% of initial IBD consultant clinics. IBD pick up was high at 70% in direct to IBD endoscopy group, identifying a higher-need IBD population. Triaging GP