Testing solution models for phase equilibrium (forward) modeling of partial melting experiments

This study compares four sets of solution (or activity-composition) models using two internally consistent thermodynamic datasets for calculating isochemical phase diagram sections of six partial melting experiments covering a wide range of metasedimentary bulk compositions. Compared parameters are:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contributions to mineralogy and petrology 2021, Vol.176 (1), Article 4
Hauptverfasser: Gervais, Félix, Trapy, Pierre-Henri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compares four sets of solution (or activity-composition) models using two internally consistent thermodynamic datasets for calculating isochemical phase diagram sections of six partial melting experiments covering a wide range of metasedimentary bulk compositions. Compared parameters are: (1) biotite-breakdown temperatures; (2) parageneses of Fe–Mg phases and Ti-oxides; (3) proportion of biotite, garnet, liquid and plagioclase; (4) Mg# of biotite, garnet and liquid and the anorthite content of plagioclase. Results reveal significant differences between sets that are mainly related to the construction of the biotite solution, with the model of Tajčmanová et al. (2009) yielding better results for the majority of investigated parameters. Owing to the success of the investigated set of solution models at reproducing the proxy that constitutes partial melting experiments, but also at reproducing natural observations as published elsewhere, it is suggested that this biotite model should be used in the Ti–Mn–Na–Ca–K–Fe–Mg–Al–Si–H–O system for phase equilibrium (forward) modeling of metasediments.
ISSN:0010-7999
1432-0967
DOI:10.1007/s00410-020-01762-5