Changing research culture toward more use of replication research: a narrative review of barriers and strategies

The aim of this paper is to review the literature on barriers to conducting replication research and strategies to increase its use and promotion by researchers, editors, and funders. This review was part of a larger meta-narrative review aimed at conducting a concept analysis of replication and developing a replication research framework. A combination of systematic and snowball search strategies was used to identify relevant literature in multiple research fields. Data were coded and analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework for barriers to replication and the behavior change wheel for solutions. In total, 153 papers were included in this narrative review. Multiple barriers limit the use of replication research by researchers, editors, and funders. Many of the barriers were related to knowledge and skills of all these actors. Social influences and the research environmental context were also described as not supportive. Multiple strategies were proposed to create positive outcomes expectations, reinforcement, and structural changes in the physical and social context of research. A social change involving advisory groups, research organizations, and institutions is required to establish new norms that will value, promote, support, and reward replication research. •Multiple barriers deeply rooted in the culture of research limit the conduct of replication research.•Social influences, environmental context, reinforcement, knowledge, and skills are all inter-related factors influencing researchers’ behavior about replication research.•Editors and funders can promote and provide opportunities and conditions to increase use of replication.•Strategies found in the literature suggest that a social and community change is required to address these multilevel barriers.