Impact of health literacy on shared decision making for prostate‐specific antigen screening in the United States

Background Current guidelines endorse shared decision making (SDM) for prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening. The relationship between a patient's health literacy (HL) and SDM remains unclear. In the current study, the authors sought to identify the impact of HL on the rates of PSA screenin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.249-256
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, David‐Dan, Trinh, Quoc‐Dien, Cole, Alexander P., Kilbridge, Kerry L., Mahal, Brandon A., Hayn, Matt, Hansen, Moritz, Han, Paul K. J., Sammon, Jesse D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Current guidelines endorse shared decision making (SDM) for prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening. The relationship between a patient's health literacy (HL) and SDM remains unclear. In the current study, the authors sought to identify the impact of HL on the rates of PSA screening and on the relationship between HL and SDM following the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against PSA screening. Methods Using data from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the authors examined PSA screening in the 13 states that administered the optional “Health Literacy” module. Men aged ≥50 years were examined. Complex samples multivariable logistic regression models were computed to assess the odds of undergoing PSA screening. The interactions between HL and SDM were also examined. Results A weighted sample of 12.249 million men with a rate of PSA screening of 33.4% were identified. Approximately one‐third self‐identified as having optimal HL. Rates of PSA screening were found to be highest amongst the highest HL group (42.2%). Being in this group was a significant predictor of undergoing PSA screening (odds ratio, 1.214; 95% confidence interval, 1.051‐1.403). There was a significant interaction observed between HL and SDM (P for interaction,
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.33239