The influence of substrate type on macroinvertebrate assemblages within agricultural drainage ditches

Artificial drainage ditches are common features in lowland agricultural catchments that support a wide range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Current paradigms in river management suggest activities that increase habitat heterogeneity and complexity resulting in more diverse floral and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2020-11, Vol.847 (20), p.4273-4284
Hauptverfasser: Gething, Kieran J., Ripley, Matthew C., Mathers, Kate L., Chadd, Richard P., Wood, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4284
container_issue 20
container_start_page 4273
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 847
creator Gething, Kieran J.
Ripley, Matthew C.
Mathers, Kate L.
Chadd, Richard P.
Wood, Paul J.
description Artificial drainage ditches are common features in lowland agricultural catchments that support a wide range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Current paradigms in river management suggest activities that increase habitat heterogeneity and complexity resulting in more diverse floral and faunal assemblages; however, it is not known if the same principles apply to artificial drainage ditch systems. We examined the effects of four artificial substrates, representing increasing habitat complexity and heterogeneity (bricks, gravel, netting and vegetation), on macroinvertebrate community structure within artificial drainage ditches. Each substrate type supported a distinct macroinvertebrate community highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in maintaining macroinvertebrate assemblages. Each substrate type also displayed differing degrees of community heterogeneity, with gravel communities being most variable and artificial vegetation being the least. In addition, several macroinvertebrate diversity metrics increased along the gradient of artificial substrate complexity, although these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that habitat management practices that increase habitat complexity are likely to enhance macroinvertebrate community heterogeneity within artificial drainage channels regardless of previous management activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-020-04416-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2471676685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A641400488</galeid><sourcerecordid>A641400488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-db19fc6ad0f8772cf6034d3339709a37fdae47e48d05451c69bd4e9d60f8b3403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rHSEUhqW00NskfyAroasuJj2Ojs4sQ-hHIBBo0rU4epxrmOvcqtMm_742UyjZFBHhnOfx6yXknMEFA1AfMwPVQQNtnUIw2chXZMc6xZuOMfWa7ABY3_Ss69-Sdzk_QJWGFnYE7_dIQ_TzitEiXTzN65hLMgVpeTrWSqQHY9MS4k9MBcfnjskZD-NsJsz0Vyj7EKmZUrDrXNZkZuqSCbF2qQvF7jGfkjfezBnP_q4n5PvnT_dXX5ub2y_XV5c3jRVclsaNbPBWGge-V6q1XgIXjnM-KBgMV94ZFApF76ATHbNyGJ3AwcnKj1wAPyHvt32PafmxYi76YVlTrEfqVigmlZR9V6mLjZrMjLo-fqnvtXU4PAS7RPSh1i-lYAJA9H0VPrwQKlPwsUxmzVlf3317ybYbW_8s54ReH1M4mPSkGeg_WektK12z0s9ZaVklvkm5wnHC9O_e_7F-A6B3l3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471676685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of substrate type on macroinvertebrate assemblages within agricultural drainage ditches</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Gething, Kieran J. ; Ripley, Matthew C. ; Mathers, Kate L. ; Chadd, Richard P. ; Wood, Paul J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gething, Kieran J. ; Ripley, Matthew C. ; Mathers, Kate L. ; Chadd, Richard P. ; Wood, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><description>Artificial drainage ditches are common features in lowland agricultural catchments that support a wide range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Current paradigms in river management suggest activities that increase habitat heterogeneity and complexity resulting in more diverse floral and faunal assemblages; however, it is not known if the same principles apply to artificial drainage ditch systems. We examined the effects of four artificial substrates, representing increasing habitat complexity and heterogeneity (bricks, gravel, netting and vegetation), on macroinvertebrate community structure within artificial drainage ditches. Each substrate type supported a distinct macroinvertebrate community highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in maintaining macroinvertebrate assemblages. Each substrate type also displayed differing degrees of community heterogeneity, with gravel communities being most variable and artificial vegetation being the least. In addition, several macroinvertebrate diversity metrics increased along the gradient of artificial substrate complexity, although these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that habitat management practices that increase habitat complexity are likely to enhance macroinvertebrate community heterogeneity within artificial drainage channels regardless of previous management activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04416-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agricultural watersheds ; Artificial substrata ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Community structure ; Complexity ; Ditches ; Drainage ; Drainage channels ; Drainage ditches ; Drainage systems ; Ecology ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental protection ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Gravel ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Hydrology ; Life Sciences ; Macroinvertebrates ; Primary Research Paper ; River ecology ; Statistical analysis ; Substrates ; Vegetation ; Zoobenthos ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2020-11, Vol.847 (20), p.4273-4284</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-db19fc6ad0f8772cf6034d3339709a37fdae47e48d05451c69bd4e9d60f8b3403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-db19fc6ad0f8772cf6034d3339709a37fdae47e48d05451c69bd4e9d60f8b3403</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4629-3163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-020-04416-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-020-04416-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gething, Kieran J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripley, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathers, Kate L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadd, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of substrate type on macroinvertebrate assemblages within agricultural drainage ditches</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Artificial drainage ditches are common features in lowland agricultural catchments that support a wide range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Current paradigms in river management suggest activities that increase habitat heterogeneity and complexity resulting in more diverse floral and faunal assemblages; however, it is not known if the same principles apply to artificial drainage ditch systems. We examined the effects of four artificial substrates, representing increasing habitat complexity and heterogeneity (bricks, gravel, netting and vegetation), on macroinvertebrate community structure within artificial drainage ditches. Each substrate type supported a distinct macroinvertebrate community highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in maintaining macroinvertebrate assemblages. Each substrate type also displayed differing degrees of community heterogeneity, with gravel communities being most variable and artificial vegetation being the least. In addition, several macroinvertebrate diversity metrics increased along the gradient of artificial substrate complexity, although these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that habitat management practices that increase habitat complexity are likely to enhance macroinvertebrate community heterogeneity within artificial drainage channels regardless of previous management activities.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural watersheds</subject><subject>Artificial substrata</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage channels</subject><subject>Drainage ditches</subject><subject>Drainage systems</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rHSEUhqW00NskfyAroasuJj2Ojs4sQ-hHIBBo0rU4epxrmOvcqtMm_742UyjZFBHhnOfx6yXknMEFA1AfMwPVQQNtnUIw2chXZMc6xZuOMfWa7ABY3_Ss69-Sdzk_QJWGFnYE7_dIQ_TzitEiXTzN65hLMgVpeTrWSqQHY9MS4k9MBcfnjskZD-NsJsz0Vyj7EKmZUrDrXNZkZuqSCbF2qQvF7jGfkjfezBnP_q4n5PvnT_dXX5ub2y_XV5c3jRVclsaNbPBWGge-V6q1XgIXjnM-KBgMV94ZFApF76ATHbNyGJ3AwcnKj1wAPyHvt32PafmxYi76YVlTrEfqVigmlZR9V6mLjZrMjLo-fqnvtXU4PAS7RPSh1i-lYAJA9H0VPrwQKlPwsUxmzVlf3317ybYbW_8s54ReH1M4mPSkGeg_WektK12z0s9ZaVklvkm5wnHC9O_e_7F-A6B3l3A</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Gething, Kieran J.</creator><creator>Ripley, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Mathers, Kate L.</creator><creator>Chadd, Richard P.</creator><creator>Wood, Paul J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-3163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>The influence of substrate type on macroinvertebrate assemblages within agricultural drainage ditches</title><author>Gething, Kieran J. ; Ripley, Matthew C. ; Mathers, Kate L. ; Chadd, Richard P. ; Wood, Paul J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-db19fc6ad0f8772cf6034d3339709a37fdae47e48d05451c69bd4e9d60f8b3403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural watersheds</topic><topic>Artificial substrata</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage channels</topic><topic>Drainage ditches</topic><topic>Drainage systems</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gething, Kieran J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripley, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathers, Kate L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadd, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gething, Kieran J.</au><au>Ripley, Matthew C.</au><au>Mathers, Kate L.</au><au>Chadd, Richard P.</au><au>Wood, Paul J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of substrate type on macroinvertebrate assemblages within agricultural drainage ditches</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>847</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4273</spage><epage>4284</epage><pages>4273-4284</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Artificial drainage ditches are common features in lowland agricultural catchments that support a wide range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Current paradigms in river management suggest activities that increase habitat heterogeneity and complexity resulting in more diverse floral and faunal assemblages; however, it is not known if the same principles apply to artificial drainage ditch systems. We examined the effects of four artificial substrates, representing increasing habitat complexity and heterogeneity (bricks, gravel, netting and vegetation), on macroinvertebrate community structure within artificial drainage ditches. Each substrate type supported a distinct macroinvertebrate community highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in maintaining macroinvertebrate assemblages. Each substrate type also displayed differing degrees of community heterogeneity, with gravel communities being most variable and artificial vegetation being the least. In addition, several macroinvertebrate diversity metrics increased along the gradient of artificial substrate complexity, although these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that habitat management practices that increase habitat complexity are likely to enhance macroinvertebrate community heterogeneity within artificial drainage channels regardless of previous management activities.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-020-04416-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-3163</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2020-11, Vol.847 (20), p.4273-4284
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2471676685
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural management
Agricultural watersheds
Artificial substrata
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Catchment area
Catchments
Community structure
Complexity
Ditches
Drainage
Drainage channels
Drainage ditches
Drainage systems
Ecology
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental protection
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Gravel
Habitats
Heterogeneity
Hydrology
Life Sciences
Macroinvertebrates
Primary Research Paper
River ecology
Statistical analysis
Substrates
Vegetation
Zoobenthos
Zoology
title The influence of substrate type on macroinvertebrate assemblages within agricultural drainage ditches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A56%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20substrate%20type%20on%20macroinvertebrate%20assemblages%20within%20agricultural%20drainage%20ditches&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Gething,%20Kieran%20J.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=847&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4273&rft.epage=4284&rft.pages=4273-4284&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-020-04416-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA641400488%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471676685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A641400488&rfr_iscdi=true