Immigration does not offset harvest mortality in groups of a cooperatively breeding carnivore

The effects of harvest on cooperatively breeding species are often more complex than simply subtracting the number of animals that died from the group count. Changes in demographic rates, particularly dispersal, could offset some effects of harvest mortality in groups but this is rarely explored wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal conservation 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.750-761
Hauptverfasser: Bassing, S. B., Ausband, D. E., Mitchell, M. S., Schwartz, M. K., Nowak, J. J., Hale, G. C., Waits, L. P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effects of harvest on cooperatively breeding species are often more complex than simply subtracting the number of animals that died from the group count. Changes in demographic rates, particularly dispersal, could offset some effects of harvest mortality in groups but this is rarely explored with cooperative breeders. We asked whether a cooperatively breeding species known for long‐distance dispersal could compensate for the effect of harvest mortality on density by adopting immigrants into the group. We used genetic samples to estimate the minimum density of gray wolves (Canis lupus) and proportion of immigrants in groups in the northern US Rocky Mountains after an annual harvest regime was initiated and in the Canadian Rocky Mountains where wolves were managed consistently under an annual harvest regime. We tested whether immigration (1) compensated, (2) partially compensated or (3) did not compensate numerically for harvest mortality in groups and hypothesized immigration would increase with increasing harvest intensity. Density of wolves in groups declined after harvest was initiated whereas immigration into groups was consistently low and did not change with harvest in the US study area. Immigration into groups was similarly low and density even lower in the Canadian study area compared to the US study area. Our results indicate immigration did not compensate for harvest mortality in groups in two separate populations of a cooperatively breeding carnivore. We hypothesize the social structure of wolf groups may limit the potentially compensatory response of immigration in some populations. The effects of hunting and trapping on cooperatively breeding species are complex but changes in demographic rates, like dispersal, may offset some effects of harvest on groups. Using noninvasive genetic data, we tested whether compensatory immigration maintained the density of group‐dwelling gray wolves (Canis lupus) when public harvest occurred in two populations of wolves in the US and Canadian Rocky Mountains. We found the density of group‐dwelling wolves decline after harvest but immigration into the groups was consistently low, suggesting that immigration did not offset harvest mortality within groups. Photo credit: Spencer Rettler.
ISSN:1367-9430
1469-1795
DOI:10.1111/acv.12593