Option pricing using Machine Learning

•Empirical comparison study on crude oil call options.•Machine Learning methods outperform Black Scholes and Corradu Su models.•Additive boosting models have the best prediction performance. This paper examines the option pricing performance of the most popular Machine Learning algorithms. The class...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Expert systems with applications 2021-01, Vol.163, p.113799, Article 113799
1. Verfasser: Ivașcu, Codruț-Florin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Empirical comparison study on crude oil call options.•Machine Learning methods outperform Black Scholes and Corradu Su models.•Additive boosting models have the best prediction performance. This paper examines the option pricing performance of the most popular Machine Learning algorithms. The classic parametrical models suffer from several limitations in term of computational power required for parametric calibration and unrealistic economical and statistical assumptions. Therefore, a data driven approach based on non-parametric models is are well justified. Most of the previous researchers focus especially on the neural networks method (NN), the other algorithms being unexplored. Beside NN, this paper also analyses the performance of the Support Vector Regressions and Genetic Algorithms and propose three other Decision Tree methods, respectively Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGMB. In order to emphasize the power of this algorithms, a comparison with classical methods like Black-Scholes and Corrado-Su with both historical and implied parameters have been conducted. The analyzes were performed on European call options who have as underlying asset the WTI crude oil future contracts. Machine Learning algorithms outperform by a great margin the classical approaches regardless of the moneyness and the maturity of the contracts.
ISSN:0957-4174
1873-6793
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113799