The pragmeme of disagreement and its allopracts in English and Serbian political interview discourse

The paper explores the disagreement pragmeme as a culture-bound notion ( Mey 2016a , 2016b , 2001 ) in the language use of English-speaking and Serbian-speaking politicians. The objectives are to establish the types, frequencies and cultural specificities of disagreement allopracts in political interviews. Furthermore, the research analyses allopracts in relation to the single and multiple dispute profiles ( van Eemeren, Houtlosser and Henkemans 2007 ). The starting assumption is that allopracts will be realised in culturally specific ways despite the fact that the analysed pragmeme belongs to the same communication genre, which is the Immediately Relevant tertium comparationis ( Krzeszowski 1990 ) of the research. The hypothesis to be verified is that the Serbian sub-corpus will yield more examples of strong disagreement. Another aim is to classify the obtained allopracts according to their degrees of strength. The analysis is based on the corpus of 50 political interviews, involving 30 politicians and 262 allopracts.