Modeling Storm Sewer Networks and Urban Flooding in Roanoke, Virginia, with SWMM and GSSHA

AbstractModeling urban flooding is challenging because of complex spatial variations and interactions between precipitation, land cover, and drainage networks. This paper presents a case study of the development of two hydrology and hydraulics models—the semidistributed storm water management model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrologic engineering 2021-01, Vol.26 (1), Article 05020044
Hauptverfasser: Brendel, Conrad E, Dymond, Randel L, Aguilar, Marcus F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AbstractModeling urban flooding is challenging because of complex spatial variations and interactions between precipitation, land cover, and drainage networks. This paper presents a case study of the development of two hydrology and hydraulics models—the semidistributed storm water management model (SWMM) and the fully distributed gridded surface/subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model—to simulate the hydrologic response of two neighboring urban watersheds with large storm sewer networks in the city of Roanoke, Virginia. Both models were calibrated and validated for the two watersheds based on nine events (May–October 2018), and the models were assessed on their ability to replicate measured stream discharge and storm sewer flow depths. The findings from the study indicate that both models reasonably capture the observed hydrologic responses but that each model offers unique benefits. Overall, SWMM’s value to the city is its ability to provide detailed information regarding the hydraulic conditions within the city’s storm sewer network, whereas GSSHA’s value to the city is its ability to predict the duration and spatial extent of flooding in two dimensions.
ISSN:1084-0699
1943-5584
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002021