Comparative study of binary cadmium sulfide (CdS) and tin disulfide (SnS2) thin buffer layers

[Display omitted] •Binary CdS and SnS2 were prepared via CBD and Hydrothermal procedures, respectively.•XRD diffraction peaks of CdS and SnS2 thin films are confirmed polycrystalline nature.•The surface homogeneity of SnS2 exhibit big grains and coalescence than CdS thin films.•The resultant band ga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2020-09, Vol.208, p.637-642
Hauptverfasser: Ullah, Shafi, Bouich, Amal, Ullah, Hanif, Mari, Bernabé, Mollar, Miguel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Binary CdS and SnS2 were prepared via CBD and Hydrothermal procedures, respectively.•XRD diffraction peaks of CdS and SnS2 thin films are confirmed polycrystalline nature.•The surface homogeneity of SnS2 exhibit big grains and coalescence than CdS thin films.•The resultant band gaps to be 2.45 eV, 2.20 eV for SnS2 and CdS thin films, respectively.•A remarkable photocurrent (140 µA/ cm2) observed for SnS2 as compare to CdS (80 µA/ cm2) thin films. Binary compound tin disulfide (SnS2) and cadmium sulfide (CdS) are the potential candidates used as a buffer layer for copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS) thin-film device. Herein, both compounds have been successfully prepared through simple hydrothermal (HD) and chemical bath deposition (CBD) techniques, respectively. The prepared samples were characterized by different available techniques like X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), surface electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), transmittance electrons microscopy (TEM), UV–Visible spectroscopy and photoelectrochemical (PEC) analysis. The XRD analysis confirms the polycrystalline nature of the prepared thin films. AFM analysis showed that the SnS2 display better roughness (60 nm), grain size (75 nm) than CdS roughness (23 nm), grain size (41 nm) thin films. SEM and EDS studies revealed near stoichiometry behavior of elemental composition of the films. The optical absorption spectrum showed the direct bandgap of CdS 2.45 eV and 2.20 eV for SnS2 thin films. The PEC analysis revealed that the SnS2 thin films exhibit two times higher photoresponse (140 µA) as compare to CdS (80 µA) thin films. The SnS2 high photocurrent could be attributed to the small band gap and increase in grain size which can trap more incident light. Based on the results the SnS2 used as a buffer layer can be a good choice for an efficient photovoltaic device.
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.036