There Are No Cubic Graphs on 26 Vertices with Crossing Number 10 or 11

We show that no cubic graphs of order 26 have crossing number larger than 9, which proves a conjecture of Ed Pegg Jr and Geoffrey Exoo that the smallest cubic graphs with crossing number 11 have 28 vertices. This result is achieved by first eliminating all girth 3 graphs from consideration, and then...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graphs and combinatorics 2020-11, Vol.36 (6), p.1713-1721
Hauptverfasser: Clancy, Kieran, Haythorpe, Michael, Newcombe, Alex, Pegg, Ed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We show that no cubic graphs of order 26 have crossing number larger than 9, which proves a conjecture of Ed Pegg Jr and Geoffrey Exoo that the smallest cubic graphs with crossing number 11 have 28 vertices. This result is achieved by first eliminating all girth 3 graphs from consideration, and then using the recently developed QuickCross heuristic to find drawings with few crossings for each remaining graph. We provide a minimal example of a cubic graph on 28 vertices with crossing number 10, and also exhibit for the first time a cubic graph on 30 vertices with crossing number 12, which we conjecture is minimal.
ISSN:0911-0119
1435-5914
DOI:10.1007/s00373-020-02204-6