Effect of electrohydrodynamic pretreatment on drying rate and rehydration properties of Chilean sea cucumber (Athyonidium chilensis)

[Display omitted] •Electrohydrodynamic pretreatment used in freeze drying (FD) Chilean sea cucumber•30 kV-30 min pretreatment- FD had better drying and rehydration parameters•Drying parameters improved with electrohydrodynamic pretreatment•Good fit of Weibull model to experimental water rehydration...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and bioproducts processing 2020-09, Vol.123, p.284-295
Hauptverfasser: Tamarit-Pino, Yanara, Batías-Montes, José Miguel, Segura-Ponce, Luis Andrés, Díaz-Álvarez, Rodrigo Emilio, Guzmán-Meza, Marco Fernando, Quevedo-León, Roberto Agustín
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Electrohydrodynamic pretreatment used in freeze drying (FD) Chilean sea cucumber•30 kV-30 min pretreatment- FD had better drying and rehydration parameters•Drying parameters improved with electrohydrodynamic pretreatment•Good fit of Weibull model to experimental water rehydration and absorption data•Crust formation influenced electrohydrodynamic rehydration ratio and sun drying The objective of this study was to apply electrohydrodynamic (EHD) as a pretreatment, including several voltages and an application time of less than 1 h, combined with freeze drying (FD) to determine their influence on drying kinetics and drying rate, final moisture content, rehydration rate, and water absorption capacity, also, rehydration and water absorption capacity rates derived from the Weibull model. The best combination was compared with sun drying (SD) and FD. Initial drying rate increased because EHD influenced the moisture content on the product surface as exposure voltage increased. Rehydration and water absorption had a heterogeneous behavior, regardless of voltage. The 30 kV-30 min pretreatment had better drying kinetics and rate and was therefore compared with FD and SD, showing better results in the drying parameters. However, for rehydration before 2.5 h, FD behaved better. The Weibull model had a good fit to the experimental data for the three treatments. Crust formation was greater in the SD treatment, followed by EHD combined with FD, which was reflected in rehydration.
ISSN:0960-3085
1744-3571
DOI:10.1016/j.fbp.2020.07.012