Tighter Confinement Increases Selectivity of d‐Glucose Isomerization Toward l‐Sorbose in Titanium Zeolites

Aqueous‐phase isomerization of d‐glucose to d‐fructose and l‐sorbose is catalyzed in parallel by Lewis acidic Ti sites in siliceous frameworks. Glucose isomerization rates (per Ti, 373 K) are undetectable when Ti sites are confined within mesoporous voids (Ti‐MCM‐41, TiO2‐SiO2) and increase to detec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Angewandte Chemie 2020-10, Vol.132 (43), p.19264-19269
Hauptverfasser: Cordon, Michael J., Vega‐Vila, Juan Carlos, Casper, Alyssa, Huang, Zige, Gounder, Rajamani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aqueous‐phase isomerization of d‐glucose to d‐fructose and l‐sorbose is catalyzed in parallel by Lewis acidic Ti sites in siliceous frameworks. Glucose isomerization rates (per Ti, 373 K) are undetectable when Ti sites are confined within mesoporous voids (Ti‐MCM‐41, TiO2‐SiO2) and increase to detectable values when Ti sites are confined within the smaller 12‐membered ring (12‐MR) micropores of Ti‐Beta. Isomerization rates decrease to lower values (by ≈20×) with further decreases in micropore size as Ti sites are confined within 10‐MR pores (Ti‐MFI, Ti‐CON), likely because of intrapore reactant diffusion restrictions, and reach undetectable values within the 8‐MR pores of Ti‐CHA as size exclusion prevents glucose from accessing active sites. Remarkably, the selectivity toward l‐sorbose over d‐fructose increases systematically as spatial constraints around Ti sites become tighter, and is >10 on Ti‐MFI. These findings demonstrate the marked influence of confinement around Ti active sites on the selectivity between parallel stereoselective sugar isomerization pathways. Tighter spatial constraints around titanium active sites in microporous and mesoporous materials promote the stereoselective isomerization of d‐glucose toward l‐sorbose over d‐fructose.
ISSN:0044-8249
1521-3757
DOI:10.1002/ange.202005207