Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Estimation of Two Formulations of Alfuzosin Extended‐Release Tablets

Alfuzosin is a medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. Bioequivalence studies are demanded by regulatory authorities to evaluate the expected in vivo biological similarity of 2 formulations of a medication. The aim of this study is t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology in drug development 2020-10, Vol.9 (7), p.780-784
Hauptverfasser: Al Bawab, Abdel Qader, Alkhalidi, Bashar A., Albarahmieh, Esra'a, Qassim, Sami M.A., Al‐Saifi, Mohammad A.D., Al‐Saifi, Bashar, Ling, Jonathan, Al‐Qerem, Walid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Alfuzosin is a medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. Bioequivalence studies are demanded by regulatory authorities to evaluate the expected in vivo biological similarity of 2 formulations of a medication. The aim of this study is to assess the bioavailability of the generic (test) and branded (reference) formulations of 10‐mg alfuzosin extended‐release tablets after oral administration to healthy adults under fed conditions. The study used a comparative randomized, single‐dose, 2‐way crossover open‐label study design. Thirty‐three participants were recruited and completed the clinical assessment. The pharmacokinetic parameters maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC0‐t), AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0‐∞), time to maximum concentration, and elimination half‐life were estimated to prove bioequivalence. The confidence intervals for the log‐transformed test/reference ratios for alfuzosin 110.7% (98.0–124.9) and 112.0% (101.9–123.1) for Cmax and AUC0‐t respectively, which are within the allowed limits specified by the regulatory authorities (80–125% for Cmax and AUC0‐t). The test formulation can therefore be prescribed as an alternative to the reference for symptomatic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
ISSN:2160-763X
2160-7648
DOI:10.1002/cpdd.860