Efficient Design of Integrated and Adaptively Interlinked Protocols for Early-Phase Drug Development Programs

Background Adaptive trial designs have the potential to address common challenges in drug development; they decrease timelines and costs of early drug development and efficiently create data that support future trials in target populations. While allowing for flexibility and evolution, adaptive strategies introduce some complexity to the design and implementation of trial protocols. Previously published work by the authors include a retrospective analysis of time savings using adaptive design and a systematic, 3- step methodology for writing early-phase adaptive integrated protocols. Methods: This article builds on the authors’ published work demonstrating the practical implementation of the adaptive protocol writing methodology and discussing the challenges and efficiencies. It describes the integration of an early development program of OBE022, a novel, oral, selective prostaglandin F2a receptor antagonist, intended as a treatment for preterm labor, using 2 interdependent, adaptive trial protocols. The program consisted of first-in-human single and multiple ascending dose parts with assessments of food effect, cardiac safety, proof of concept, and interactions of OBE022 with 4 standard of care medicines. Results: The manuscript shows how the trials were tailored to OBE022’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and its therapeutic indication. The use of 2 large interdependent, adaptive protocols was facilitated by the United Kingdom’s (UK’s) regulatory environment and its acceptance of a rules-guided progression through the program. Changes to the planned trial conduct could be made without impacting on timelines, because they used predefined adaptive options within their authorized boundaries, and could therefore be made as nonsubstantial amendments. The program was successful and achieved its objectives. It was efficient and fast: it required a small number of participants (n=83) and completed from start of protocol writing to first draft of the clinical study report in just 11 months. Conclusions: This program included all key elements of early drug development in 2 interlinked protocols: the assessment of single and multiple ascending doses, food effect, cardiac safety and proof of concept. The approach described in this article demonstrates how early-phase programs can be designed to be performed, analyzed and reported time- and cost-efficiently.