The upgrade of NIM-2 joule balance since 2017

In 2017, we published the first measurement result with the NIM-2 joule balance and the relative standard uncertainty was 2.4 × 10−7. Since then, a series of improvements have been carried out to upgrade the NIM-2 joule balance towards the 10-8 level relative uncertainty. The main improvements inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metrologia 2020-10, Vol.57 (5), p.55007
Hauptverfasser: Li, Zhengkun, Bai, Yang, Xu, Jinxin, Lu, Yunfeng, Hu, Pengcheng, Liu, Yongmeng, Wang, Dawei, You, Qiang, Qian, Lushuai, Zhang, Zhonghua, He, Qing, Tan, Jiubin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 2017, we published the first measurement result with the NIM-2 joule balance and the relative standard uncertainty was 2.4 × 10−7. Since then, a series of improvements have been carried out to upgrade the NIM-2 joule balance towards the 10-8 level relative uncertainty. The main improvements include a permanent magnet, as well as a two-layer magnetic shield to decrease the main uncertainty contribution from the external magnetic field, a parasitic displacement measurement system and a new suspension for improving alignments, and a new mass translation stage constructed with all non-magnetic materials. In September 2019, when the NIM-2 joule balance was used to calibrate a 1 kg mass, the type A relative standard uncertainty had been reduced to 3 × 10−8(k= 1) and the combined relative standard uncertainty was less than 1 × 10−7(k= 1). In October and November 2019, a 1 kg Pt/Ir mass and a 1 kg stainless steel mass were measured with the NIM-2 joule balance, and the relative standard uncertainties were 5.2 × 10−8 and 6.5 × 10−8, respectively. The relative difference between the measured values and the calibration values obtained from the mass group were 4 × 10−9 and 3 × 10−8, respectively.
ISSN:0026-1394
1681-7575
DOI:10.1088/1681-7575/ab9211