Case Study and Proposal for a Two-Part Phased Assessment for Unacculturated Seminary Candidates

This case study is based on a composite of several men who presented for seminary candidate assessment. The particular case study outlines some of the problems with the standard assessment protocol for suitability to enter seminary studies. Specifically, candidates who have not been acculturated to North American and in particular U.S. customs, mores, and idiomatic speech may present as more pathological than is true-particularly during an initial transitional period. Thus, it is proposed that a 2-part phased model be used. The first phase would include the assessment of English language acquisition, cognitive functioning, and a Clinical Interview focused on emotional development, psychosexual development, potential trauma, and a vocational interview. This first report would include a disclaimer, stating that it is not a complete assessment and that the professional opinion of the assessor is preliminary. The second phase would include standard self-report personality measures, projective and performative personality measures, a follow-up Clinical Interview, and input from formators. The second report would have a statement to the effect that it is the completed report and represents the professional opinion of the assessor. This model should minimize the possibility of overpathologizing international candidates, while still providing timely feedback to ensure the suitability of these candidates for seminarian formation and a subsequent life of service in the United States.