Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is first, to discuss the theoretical assumptions, qualities, problems and myopia of the dominating quantitative and qualitative approaches; second, to describe the methodological lessons that the authors learned while conducting a series of longitudinal studies on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative research in accounting and management 2011-01, Vol.8 (1), p.59-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is first, to discuss the theoretical assumptions, qualities, problems and myopia of the dominating quantitative and qualitative approaches; second, to describe the methodological lessons that the authors learned while conducting a series of longitudinal studies on the use and usefulness of a specialized balanced scorecard; and third, to encourage researchers to actually use multiple methods and sources of data to address the very many accounting phenomena that are not fully understood.Design methodology approach - This paper is an opinion piece based on the authors' experience conducting a series of longitudinal mixed method studies.Findings - The authors suggest that in many studies, using a mixed method approach provides the best opportunity for addressing research questions.Originality value - This paper provides encouragement to those who may wish to bridge the authors' ideological gaps and to those who are actively trying to do so. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1176-6093 1758-7654 |
DOI: | 10.1108/11766091111124702 |