Shop floor simulation optimization using machine learning to improve parallel metaheuristics

•A simulation optimization problem was developed for a shop floor.•The optimization integrated parallelism, metaheuristics, and machine learning.•Was obtained a solution 95.32% near the global optimum and time reduction of 95.2%. Simulation optimization is a tool commonly used as a decision-making s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Expert systems with applications 2020-07, Vol.150, p.113272, Article 113272
Hauptverfasser: Sousa Junior, Wilson Trigueiro de, Montevechi, José Arnaldo Barra, Miranda, Rafael de Carvalho, Oliveira, Mona Liza Moura de, Campos, Afonso Teberga
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A simulation optimization problem was developed for a shop floor.•The optimization integrated parallelism, metaheuristics, and machine learning.•Was obtained a solution 95.32% near the global optimum and time reduction of 95.2%. Simulation optimization is a tool commonly used as a decision-making support system on industrial problems in order to find the best resource allocation, which has a direct influence on costs and revenues. The present study proposed an open-source framework developed on Python, integrating different strategies for a novel optimization algorithm. The framework includes multicore parallelism (tested on two different types of computer sets), (two) population-based metaheuristics, and 33 machine learning methods. Moreover, the study tested the framework to optimize resource allocation on a theoretical shop floor case study, evaluating 12 optimization scenarios. The use of metaheuristic with parallelism reduced 88.3% the processing time compared with the serial metaheuristic, while the integration of metaheuristic with the selected machine learning generated an additional reduction of 59.0% on the necessary processing time. The combination of the optimization methods created a solution of 95.3% near the global optimum and time reduction of 95.2%.
ISSN:0957-4174
1873-6793
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113272